pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 1h \ parent \ on: The Corporate Veil Politics_And_Law
Very nice logic tree! No victim, no crime.
I guess being proud of your status has been something since the Babylonian days. Slave will be slave and proud of it!!! :)
This has really been ingrained in people for many, many generations.
Yeah, but I don’t know about the AIs. I have never tried to use one. I guess I have aged out of that sort of crutch.
According to some, we can do that already. You just have to learn how to put yourself in the proper place, somehow.
Even if you do not consent they make you their slave in the name of democracy. Yes, it is the slavery of democracy. Lots of people don’t seem to realize that yet. BTW, I don’t vote and will never vote.
Wresting it from bank, church and government hands is a task-and-a-half from what I can make of it. I have no problem being responsible for my actions. I don’t like being responsible for other people’s actions, though.
21 sats \ 8 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 20h \ parent \ on: The Corporate Veil Politics_And_Law
I guess the education of the people on the streets is sorely lacking. Most of the time I won’t even carry an ID because it is definitely not me or ever a proper representation of me.
I have to agree that we continue being slaves and batteries until we free our minds!
Didn’t Jefferson say something about obedience to masters some time ago?
Yes, it is also hard to transfer over a network that is downed. Or to produce BTC at the store with no electricity for days.
I’ve seen this document several times, before. Does it completely separate you from you fictional “person”? Do you lose control of the trust established in your “personal” name at birth? Can you still control your trust?
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 20h \ parent \ on: The Corporate Veil Politics_And_Law
Private: To be “in the private” is to “live” in a “private capacity” as a Man or Woman, with flesh and blood, arms and legs, a conscious mind, a spirit, and Life. All Men and Women are created as equal Sovereigns, endowed with Unalienable Rights and Properties, including Credit equating to their valuable human energy. As natural Men and Women, they are Creditors, because they are born naturally with innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Unlimited, and they have unlimited liability, being responsible adults. They are outside and above the State. From Latin privatus “set apart, belonging to oneself (not to the state)”.
Public: To be “in the public” is to “act” in a “public capacity” as an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to an “artificial person” created and governed by the State. All Men and Women who “act” in legal fiction “roles” for the State are granted revocable Privileges and Benefits prescribed in legislative “Acts”. As Artificial Persons, they are Debtors, because they are created legally without innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Limited, and they have limited liability, being legally incompetent “creatures of the State”, its legal children. They are inside and under the State. From Latin publicus “of the people; of the state; done for the state”.
This is pretty strong stuff but isn’t it fairly common knowledge? The problem is escaping the Maritime system and coming ashore. Contracts are contracts and I think most people understand them to a point but forget that uncontested implied contracts are contracts. This is why I just hate the EULs.
Yes, simple is the best. BTC approaches gold as being simple, however, it is attached to computing power so it is also attached to the electrical network and internet. That makes BTC vulnerable to several points of failure in the grids. Not a very happy sort of mental image, is it?
21 sats \ 9 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 20h \ parent \ on: The Corporate Veil Politics_And_Law
Thanks for the pointers and links. The meme is a hard hitter, too. Thanks for the response for those who will look into the articles you linked to, Intend to look long and hard.
Thank you!
Well, what can you say when the court historians and economists of the Keynesian variety gaslight him and the public. It is like the case of Fauci and Birx gaslighting him on the COVID protections that got put in place. Trump may be very good at negotiating and getting buildings built, but he has some troubles when it comes to listening to experts.
Now, whenever I hear someone claiming to be an expert, I pull out my BS meter and expect the worst. I guess this is what you get when you have rent-an-experts and paid-for jokers all over the place, eager to advise on matters of import.
By the way, I posted another article that deals with technocracy, expertism and experts at: #944376