pull down to refresh
I'm so glad that it's not just me who experiences these issues. I think it was Einstein said that there is 99 fails before success. That's Einstein who only has 99. For me it's more like 999. I've built 4 full CNC machines, countless 3d printers, engravers, and lots of different CNC style machines. I have a large 4' x ???* Machine 80% done sitting in my shop doing nothing as I don't have the space for it currently. I live on an island and there are very very few CNC machines here. Example I seen a 4 x 8 machine that was probably about 20+ years old running grbl I believe. Selling price was $100,000($70,000 us) I build machines and they cost me $500-750 to build.
All the time.
The intelligence of the son hasn't been explained in this book. Later on in the series. Gabriel is 16 when the story begins.
What I really like about this series is it's 100% new and original. Even if you don't like sci Fi the story is good
After leaving a laptop in 2011-2012 with an amount of BTC I don't want to say as I'm too embarrassed to get thrown out as I was lazy to go get it. Having electrum wallets telling me I needed to update and when I did all my btc went to a 3859:37163:**** address. Writing 16 hour none selling udemy courses on crypto. The world would have to end.
You should check out some of my posts.
Zapping is giving me issues or I would
I’ve been thinking more about the Patoshi Decoy Theory I posted earlier, and there’s actually a lot more depth to it than I could fit in one note.
The more you study early Bitcoin behavior, the harder it is to believe the Patoshi pattern was just an accident. There are multiple technical and psychological signals that point toward intentional design — not in a conspiratorial way, but in a Satoshi‑level systems‑thinking way.
If people want it, I can break down:
• why the pattern is too clean to be random
• how early mining behavior supports the decoy idea
• why dormancy is a stabilizing force in Bitcoin
• how Satoshi used optics and misdirection in other parts of the protocol
• what this theory explains that the standard explanations don’t
If there’s interest, I’ll post the expanded analysis.
It's so nice to see people seeing the big picture of what I'm trying to do. One person trying to do all the roles of a large multi product company