pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ca 18 Dec \ on: Bet on the US election with sats on bitcoinprediction.market bitcoin
@HYPERBITCOINZATION
The market "Trump inauguration" is marked as ENDED and PAID. But I have not received my payment.
Can you double check: ted.....44@walletofsatoshi.com -> 40,000 sats
I do think it is about the book.
Anyone who becomes a public figure around Bitcoin gets massively scrutinised.
If it wasn't for the latest book, he would have stayed low key and officials would have not know about him. I do believe the book and the timing of its release + arrest, after so many years, is not coincidental.
The speaker explains their current perspective on Bitcoin upgrades, particularly CheckTemplateVerify (CTV). They feel uneasy about their position, acknowledging that it may not fully align with objective truth but remain unsure where their reasoning falls short. The core points include:
1. Complexity of Bitcoin Upgrades
Bitcoin upgrades, such as CTV, are polarizing. The speaker explores the broader implications, including governance, user trust, and technical impact, rather than focusing solely on technical details.
2. CTV Advocacy
CTV, which allows users to set conditions on spending Bitcoin, is seen as relatively innocuous, akin to previous features like CheckLockTimeVerify and multisig. The speaker argues that it could improve scalability and security (e.g., vaults for enhanced theft resistance) without introducing major risks.
3. Community Division
The speaker highlights a divide between:
- Advocates for Bitcoin as inert "perfect money."
- Those who see the need for periodic upgrades to adapt to evolving use cases.
The latter group believes Bitcoin's stagnancy undermines its resilience.
4. Criticisms and Risks
Governance Challenges
The speaker critiques Bitcoin Core for being slow and politically averse to implementing even widely agreed-upon features.
Misaligned Advocates
Skepticism exists toward proponents of certain upgrades who may prioritize personal agendas over Bitcoin’s best interests.
Risk of Unintended Consequences
While acknowledging the potential for unintended side effects, the speaker argues that CTV's limited scope makes such risks minimal.
5. Broader Implications
Beyond CTV itself, the debate symbolizes larger issues in Bitcoin's governance and decentralization. The speaker suggests that activating CTV without Bitcoin Core could demonstrate the community's ability to circumvent bottlenecks in development.
6. Call for Action and Collaboration
The speaker encourages informed debate, transparency, and collaboration to ensure decisions align with Bitcoin’s principles and long-term viability.
Summary
While cautiously supporting CTV as a beneficial upgrade, the speaker emphasizes its symbolic role in addressing Bitcoin’s stagnancy and governance inefficiencies. They invite counterarguments to refine their stance and guide the community’s next steps.
Isn't a voluntary agreement between two parties libertarian?
The United States, Ukraine and the United Kingdom all voluntarily agreed to the "Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances".
Since when do libertarians do not believe in signed agreements, property rights, defence of lives and freedoms?
Can you have any freedoms if you are enslaved to an enemy state?
When will us libertarian stop sucking Putin's dick?
I wish we had gotten a demo of the self-custodial Lightning wallets at the time of the blocksize war promises. It turned out much more messy than I'd have imagined, we lost so many of the bitcoin properties in terms of ease of use.
Have you ever tried developing an app on LN?
Onboarding non technical users is beyond-belief horrible.
Teach your grandma how to manage liquidity channels, before even making or receiving the very first transaction