pull down to refresh
@ek
4,909,353 sats stacked
stacking since: #57444longest cowboy streak: 233 verified stacker.news contributornpub16x07c...2j2s96s89dekzyis
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 57m \ parent \ on: Social Engineering Practice 0x01 security
Very similar to #898691 but I like that you included a reason why you didn’t use the crew entrance (assuming it exists).
However, I think it’s better to only have an excuse in mind but don’t immediately tell the security, only when asked. If you tell them immediately, it can look like a guy who is guilty and immediately tells the police in detail when they arrive what he allegedly didn’t do.
Yes, music festival!
Not bad, I can see this work to get in, especially if you’re a fast runner. I didn’t mention this in the post, but how do you get out without consequences though? And are there no security patrols that would immediately see you don’t have a wrist band? Essentially, what is your exit strategy?
I also assume you choose specifically hat and jumper because it’s easy to get rid of a hat and update your description and with a jumper, you only have to undress since you can wear other clothes below.
Sorry for the late reply, I missed this.
but it just gets stuck atWaiting for authorizationand I see nothing on desktop browser where I hitConnectafter signing up on nsec.app.
Mhhh, when you see
Waiting for authorization, it should have prompted you in nsec.app.Login via remote nostr signer is a 3-step process:
- Create new app connection in remote signer (nsec.app) and copy bunker url
- Paste bunker url into SN
- Confirm login in remote signer
Is this what you tried but the confirmation prompt didn't appear in the remote signer?
Will test myself to make sure this still works.
We wait one minute between each attempt and after one hour or two retries, whatever comes first, we stop retrying. I think that answers your actual question since how long an attempt takes depends on a lot of factors mostly outside our control.
Payments will be retried in the background two times so I suspect you zapped something again because you thought it failed but then the retry was successful. If a failed payment doesn’t show up in notifications, it will still get retried so I recommend only retrying from your notifications, not based on what you see in satistics.
Thanks for mentioning, that’s an UX issue. It’s not shown anywhere that we retry payments.
no stacker.news native mobile applications, nor are they really planned
yes, no app and not planned currently
How can I log in if I signed up using nos2x and my nsec? As far as I can tell, SN doesn't allow for the user to use theirnsec, rather uses NIP-05 or I assume thenos2xbrowser add-on in this case could help.
Yes, we don't allow you to give us your nsec for security reasons.
On mobile, since you can't use a nostr signer extension like nos2x (NIP-07), you can only use a remote signer like nsec.app via NIP-46.
Is there a way for me to create credentials for SN at this point, or what would be the best way to go about this?
You should be able to enter your existing nsec into nsec.app and then create a connection in the app (a link that starts with bunker://). When you paste this link into the text input on the SN nostr login page, the app should prompt you to confirm the login.
Can you see messages that start with "ok" in the logs of that wallet? The indicators go red if the most recent message for sending/receiving is about an error.
The first giver, often a content creator, pours their heart, time, and energy into something, expecting nothing in return but hoping for recognition or a fair exchange. Instead, they're often left with scraps while others freely take, use, and even profit from their work without so much as a nod. Giving credit is passé as well... even people who blatantly steal stuff from others smile in your face and go on with their "business". Result: the first giver feels scammed out of their time.
It would have been so ironic if someone else had posted this and received the few thousand sats this will probably get, but fortunately, @avbpod is the author afaict
Like, what do you define as "paying SN" or "paying other stackers"?
Only when you zap, you pay other stackers so it will prioritize sats.
Everything else (posts, replies, boosts, votes (in polls), donations, territories, jobs, downzaps) will prioritize CCs.
If there's some sort of spilt, is part of it paid in Sats and part in CCs?
Every zap pays 30% into rewards but it's not split. If you pay with sats, it's in sats. If you pay with CCs, it's in CCs. But maybe we'll implement paying the 30% fee in CCs, too. This is the first time someone brought this up actually!
Also, from a UX perspective, it would be good to have some clearer way to choose between both CCs and Sats.
Planned and I agree, I check a lot if I just paid in CCs or sats by clicking on
... and selecting 'details'. But we have to be careful with this since making the user think too much about paying in CCs or sats can also degrade UX.Perhaps the lightning could be different colored?
I don't understand, what do you mean? Wasn't this about choosing how to pay so before the bolt is colored in any way?
This is in your link:
The same cannot be said about any other cryptocurrency.
So your link is not objecting to calling bitcoin a cryptocurrency, because it literally calls bitcoin a cryptocurrency.
I see a lot of comments everywhere insisting "Bitcoin not crypto"
Didn't your link already explain why and what is meant with that phrase? It doesn't mean that bitcoin doesn't use cryptography, it means it's not like any other cryptocurrency.