pull down to refresh
@ek
5,100,286 sats stacked
stacking since: #57444longest cowboy streak: 233 verified stacker.news contributornpub16x07c...2j2s96s89dekzyis
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 8h \ parent \ on: SNZ issue #5 - what will it be? You decide meta
Actually, I like wizard issue more now because it will remind us of the week in which @benthecarman stopped working for Taproot Wizards
Maybe that’s also why @bitcoinplebdev picked it
Haha, good question! I indeed wanted to do this first. But I was too lazy to go and get my security key that I need for MFA on git.ekzy.is when I was already logged into Github.
4. Hosted Wallet Service[...]4.2 Primal Orange Check. Bitcoin custody, send, and receive operations are performed by Primal's affiliate Zap Solutions, Inc. ("Strike"). By using our Hosted Wallet Service, you agree to be bound by this Agreement, as well as Strike's Terms of Service, as defined at https://strike.me/legal/tos/. Primal reserves the right to change the Wallet Third Party Service provider without prior notice, or to bring some or all of these services in-house. All such changes will be reflected in an update to this Agreement, as further described in Section 9 (Changes to Agreement or Services).
4. Sharing Your Information[...]Primal’s Hosted Wallet Service is offered in partnership with our affiliate Zap Solutions, Inc. ("Strike"). In order to provide a legally compliant service, we are required to share your information related to the Hosted Wallet Service with Strike.
I don't know if that's going to help.
Apparently, it did not know about the Postgres documentation since it clearly states that
a @> b means that a is the ancestor of b:I already knew that when I asked it the first question, but I wanted to see what it will say given a very neutral question and it failed miserably with a lot of words.
My trust in it is broken if it ever existed to begin with 👀
@Fabs is buying all the gold
yeah, maybe not the best thread to argue with @denlillaapan about this again haha
Oh wow, what a nice surprise to see you here today!
I shared my thoughts about how scaling Nostr will affect decentralization yesterday:
There was also some discussion about this in #950309.
Are you considering how scaling Nostr might affect decentralization?
Only if, to be intellectually consistent, you'd also say that ETF's scale Bitcoin.
To be "intellectually consistent," you should have mentioned that you can't withdraw bitcoin from your ETF while you can from a fedimint.
edit: I already regret this comment since I don't actually have a horse in this game. Just wanted to point out that there's still a big difference between ETFs and fedimints.
Current leaderboard:
| name | replies |
|---|---|
| @Aardvark | 382 |
| @grayruby | 247 |
| @OT | 232 |
| @denlillaapan | 188 |
| @realBitcoinDog | 184 |
| @Coinsreporter | 172 |
| @Roll | 106 |
| @Undisciplined | 101 |
| @NovaRift | 94 |
| WeAreAllSatoshi | 47 |
| j7hB75 | 41 |
| cryotosensei | 36 |
| StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears | 13 |
| unschooled | 10 |
| mega_dreamer | 8 |
| SimpleStacker | 8 |
| jakoyoh629 | 6 |
| flat24 | 6 |
| jasonb | 6 |
| BlokchainB | 4 |
| Dkryptoenth | 4 |
| k00b | 2 |
| DarthCoin | 2 |
| Turdinthepunchbowl | 2 |
| Lazy_AMA | 2 |
| BitcoinIsTheFuture | 2 |
| supratic | 2 |
| nitter | 2 |
| dingding541 | 1 |
| longlifelearner20 | 1 |
| oliverweiss | 1 |
| Nzowashua | 1 |
| 030e0dca83 | 1 |
| birdeye21 | 1 |
| Cappy_SC | 1 |
| Car | 1 |
| Scoresby | 1 |
| MANI | 1 |
How to verify your number: https://github.com/ekzyis/most-comments-wins
I will only mention the ones who are above me in the leaderboard from now on because I think only they are actually trying to win and thus interested in the leaderboard.