pull down to refresh
@ek
5,033,853 sats stacked
stacking since: #57444longest cowboy streak: 233 verified stacker.news contributornpub16x07c...2j2s96s89dekzyis
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 1h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin "Gold 2.0" My Ass. bitcoin
Have you tried zooming out and look where bitcoin was 5 years ago vs now?
And I don't mean just the price chart.
From @petertodd:
Strong NACK on nostr. It's a badly designed, centralized, protocol that needs a significant redesign to be usable. While off topic for this mailing list, some of its many issues include:
Reliance on single-key, cryptography that often results in people having their keys compromised. This is a serious problem in the context of bitcoin-dev, where faked messages published could easily have market-moving results. Inability to mirror relays: since nostr deliberately ignores the lessons of blockchains, there is no way to be sure that you have a complete set of messages from a given person, for a given topic, etc. Highly centralized design: since mirroring relays isn't reliable, in reality nostr operates in a highly centralized fashion, dependent on a tiny number of relays that can't be easily replaced if taken down.
Disclaimer: I didn't read your link, maybe because you didn't use a link post
If instead of proof of work in your browser, the site requests micro payment via lightning, would that work? [...] some legit users report the proof pf work taking 10 or more minutes on their machines
So you think making legit users pay to read some code on Github is better?
See ticket:
The only way to really eliminate this given the way we rank (denormalized values) is expanding the cursor to encode the items in the list that we already have, so that we can explicitly exclude them on the next page.
So basically, the ranking is different when you press
more
and the last item on the first page is now the first item on the next page.