pull down to refresh
@ek
5,511,435 sats stacked
stacking since: #57444longest cowboy streak: 233 verified stacker.news contributornpub16x07c...2j2s96s89dekzyis
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 2h \ parent \ on: will you put a robot in your home? AskSN
looks like I’m getting old
I don’t even trust printers (remember my joke about shooting one?), so I’m not sure I could ever trust a robot like that
Wow, wait, we're already at humanoid robots for home?
I'm still warming up to the vacuum cleaner robots.
what could be novel info that the computer or phone isn't already recording?
Good question, I need to noodle on that
I can think down that road and it seems positive for a lot of people.
I think it will be positive if it's "robot instead of nothing" and not "robot instead of human."
How private are my payments on Phoenix?The current version of Phoenix offers no advantage regarding privacy over existing, hosted, custodial wallets. We (ACINQ) know the final destination and amount of payments.
So, what is the reasoning here? That if you run a node and don't agree with how the network is used you should just smile and stfu?
You should first understand the problem with all its complexity before making suggestions to "save bitcoin"
This is a very basic concept. Someone makes use of their own resources to disrupt the functioning of other machines on a network.
To be fair, most DoS are DDoS and they are NOT using their own resources but botnets.
Testing ChatGPT’s knowledge about clouds
Image:
ChatGPT’s answer:
Reference for stratocumulus:
Reference for altostratus:
Reference for cirrostratus:
Mhh, not bad
it's a planet cracker ship from Dead Space but my story does not necessarily play in the Dead Space universe
I don’t think few is a bitcoiner thing
It’s part of general internet culture
edit: Ok the internet says I’m wrong, I thought this originated outside of bitcoin
I don't know what you guys are talking about, but that's great
means Stacker News is growing beyond what I can keep track of
Exactly, which is why I have a major issue with @calle pretending it's definitely not illegal.
If he can't talk openly about it, he should just keep his mouth shut and not pretend the opposite is true.
What part creates a schism?
wanting to disrupt both traditional banking systems and the global fiat currencies underpinning them with a system that can't scale to compete with them on a global level
Otherwise, it's globally adopted at the cost of disruptive impact
you want disruption, but not global adoption, that makes no sense to me