pull down to refresh

@ek
5,033,853 sats stacked
stacking since: #57444longest cowboy streak: 233 verified stacker.news contributornpub16x07c...2j2s96s89dekzyis
bio
12,401 items
2 territories
by
for
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 1h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin "Gold 2.0" My Ass. bitcoin
Have you tried zooming out and look where bitcoin was 5 years ago vs now?
And I don't mean just the price chart.
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 1h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin "Gold 2.0" My Ass. bitcoin
don't ignore my questions, else I'll also ignore yours
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 2h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin "Gold 2.0" My Ass. bitcoin
If they don't get it after 15+ years [...] then they'll most likely never get it
do you know when the internet started? and how long it took for the internet to catch on? or other technologies like cars or planes?
21 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 3h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin "Gold 2.0" My Ass. bitcoin
It will be hard to come back from this reply or #933279
@remindme in 1 month
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 4h \ parent \ on: Can you spot the XSS vulnerability? security
Yeah I probably will but maybe the mention regexp on the server didn't register the mention because of the ~ in front and deleted the reminder, let's see lol
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 4h \ parent \ on: Can you spot the XSS vulnerability? security
I don't know if you looked up the solution, but you were the first one who posted the exploit code, so I'll also pay you next to #914079
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek OP 4h \ parent \ on: Can you spot the XSS vulnerability? security
lol that was indeed the case
but maybe the hard part was to actually exploit it, not just see that it could be exploited
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek OP 4h \ on: Can you spot the XSS vulnerability? security
@remindme in 1 day to pay out the bounty
paid the bounty to #914079
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 4h \ on: A bitcoin experiment bitcoin
every comment should cost 100 sats here
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 5h \ parent \ on: Dust Attacks as a Service security
Sorry, been pretty busy, didn't find the time. But this weekend I should have time!
@remindme in 2 days
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 5h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin "Gold 2.0" My Ass. bitcoin
The change starts with us on the internet
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 6h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Dev mailing list deplatformed from Google Groups bitcoin
It hit you the most because you had the most CCs I guess
270 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 19h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Dev mailing list deplatformed from Google Groups bitcoin
From @petertodd:
Strong NACK on nostr. It's a badly designed, centralized, protocol that needs a significant redesign to be usable. While off topic for this mailing list, some of its many issues include:
  • Reliance on single-key, cryptography that often results in people having their keys compromised. This is a serious problem in the context of bitcoin-dev, where faked messages published could easily have market-moving results.
  • Inability to mirror relays: since nostr deliberately ignores the lessons of blockchains, there is no way to be sure that you have a complete set of messages from a given person, for a given topic, etc.
  • Highly centralized design: since mirroring relays isn't reliable, in reality nostr operates in a highly centralized fashion, dependent on a tiny number of relays that can't be easily replaced if taken down.
source
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 2 Apr \ on: Using lightning to prevent spam, DoS and scraping lightning
Disclaimer: I didn't read your link, maybe because you didn't use a link post
If instead of proof of work in your browser, the site requests micro payment via lightning, would that work? [...] some legit users report the proof pf work taking 10 or more minutes on their machines
So you think making legit users pay to read some code on Github is better?
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 2 Apr \ parent \ on: The double post bug?!! meta
that's a different one
55 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 2 Apr \ on: The double post bug?!! meta
See ticket:
The only way to really eliminate this given the way we rank (denormalized values) is expanding the cursor to encode the items in the list that we already have, so that we can explicitly exclude them on the next page.
So basically, the ranking is different when you press more and the last item on the first page is now the first item on the next page.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 2 Apr \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
Yes, can recommend