You either die a bitcoiner or live long enough to see yourself become a shitcoiner

imagine how relieving that must have been though

and look at that technique of covering the whole wall, quite impressive, ngl

I did not haha

So basically, the explosion in building we're seeing:

Oh, great find!

Hey, this reminded me of my recent visit to Body Worlds in Amsterdam! Body Worlds is not an art exhibition, but I experienced it as one. It was what I think art exhibitions should be like. I was in awe, and it really made me think. Our bodies are incredible!

The exhibition starts with a long, detailed disclaimer about how controversial it is, though. I'm glad I initially missed this disclaimer (we accidentally didn't start at the beginning). It allowed me to experience the "art" on my own, without other people's takes on it.

Excited for this series!

Here’s one from @fiatjaf’s blog post:

80ab328c77cbd554598c3a7b322af520a77d1687b27badfa969d2c419de785d7

I already learned gringo on SN here!

Ohh, and I learned women say “obrigada”, not “obrigado”. Very interesting!

Floresta means Forest! (And it’s named like that because it uses Merkle trees a lot.)

I also remember someone tried to say “head and shoulders” in English, and I understood “Heil Hitler”, that was so good, hahaha

Did you go to Brazil?

Yes! Currently waiting at a dead airport for my next flight back home in 4 hours. But hey, I can order food to the gate, look at that

Are you going to write about it?

Mhh, I hope so!

Very k00besque, I like

Thanks!

Damn, you just got me hooked on prediction markets again.

I still own delphi.market, and I still can't believe the domain was so cheap to get. I should do something with it.

Do you accept this as a fair position for an artist to take?

Mhmh!

I like the song, it makes me float

@niftynei very memeable for me lately haha

Fwiw, I also don’t like it for the same reasons + posts from years ago on the front page make SN look dead

I’ll reply when I have more time.

I'll just leave this here: #770966

I realise one bad side-effect of LLMs is that there's increasing pressure for code to be highly polished before sharing

I would say the opposite is true: there has never been less shame in publishing bad code. See the PRs of this guy as just one example. I think people feel less responsible for their code now, just because an LLM wrote it for them. Or LLMs attract people with the wrong mindset to start contributing code.

I must admit, I do consider the simple implementation a bad idea, or at least, an excessively coarse solution to a granular problem

It solved my problem. I have muted a lot of stackers, and some of them comment a lot. It's very tempting to click and see who wrote what, similar to what @optimism mentioned in #1439436. I don't think I've ever not regretted clicking on them.

I might have forgotten to unmute until someone mentioned him.

I've been through this. I always end up muting them again. At this point, I don't care about what I might occasionally be missing. It's not worth having a worse user experience overall.

Btw, I figured out a workaround for this: I clicked on the timestamp to be sent directly to your comment. Then I can keep clicking "parent" to read the whole thread.

I'm just reading it in reverse that way, haha.

Yes, I muted @Lux.

Thank you, I will let you know when this becomes a problem