pull down to refresh
@ek
5,352,675 sats stacked
stacking since: #57444longest cowboy streak: 233 verified stacker.news contributornpub16x07c...2j2s96s89dekzyis
Either way, the hard part is motivating people to want to learn about money.
I recently watched this (1:03 - 1:38):
If you can get a student to want to understand something, most of the work is done. So when I look at school, I can't believe how badly structured it is, because the idea is effectively to threaten you into learning something. That's not going to make it stick, it's not going to make you want to learn more.So my feeling is that you want to create a desire in the student to understand the thing, then your work is pretty much done, then it's like play.
So I wonder if there's a game out there where you can learn about money in a fun way.
lol, apparently you can just submit a fake ID of your MP via use-their-id.com:
Hi HN - I made a site that takes a UK postcode, grabs the local MP's information and generates an AI mockup of what their ID might look like.It's a small, silly protest at the stupidity of the Online Safety Act that just came into force. The IDs actually work (for Reddit, Discord etc.) which highlights how terrible this implementation is.
Connected to a Mullvad server in London and visited a nsfw subreddit:
Just entering a fake birthday is not enough, it actually requires verification:
I also can't change my fake birthday anymore ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So 1 sat can revoke my (unconditional) right to be forgotten?
you can always delete a comment, the edit timer is independent of deletes
nothing happens with the zaps or replies after deletion, they stay
It might be because the receiver wasn’t even able to return an invoice so your wallet didn’t even start paying. Sender wallet logs only start when a payment attempt starts.
That’s confusing, maybe we can change that.
But also need to confirm if that’s what you’re seeing.
How did you open a channel before? Opening a private channel is basically the same, you just need to tick a box.
But yeah, definitely get familiar with the documentation, helps a lot with running a lightning node
I assume your reply is related to this from me in #882169:
the few times I zap because someone was helpful, I feel like a more thoughtful reply about how they just changed my life would maybe have been better than a measly 21-100 sats zap.
Mhhh, maybe what I mentioned there wasn't a problem, but wishful thinking. I thought if I didn't have the option to zap, I would think "Oh, I can't zap, so now I need to reply with something so they know I appreciate them, because that's really important to me."
Now that I think about it again, I actually don't think that happens, lol. If I'd truly cared about them knowing that I appreciate them, I would zap and reply, no? One doesn't prevent the other in the cases it actually matters.
So even though what I wrote above sounded like I think zaps prevent engagement with content via thoughtful replies, I actually don't, or at least not anymore. It just allows us to show appreciation more granular?
But then again, one could argue that "more granular appreciation" also means that when you now not only have the choice between 0 (do nothing) and 100 appreciation (reply), but also everything in between, more 100's get turned into something less than 0's get turned into something more ... I don't know, thinking about this breaks my brain, I am no expert in human behavior or psychology, haha
almost forgets to zap