0 sats \ 1 reply \ @falsejaguar 12 Apr \ on: [a priori] Lot of senior Bitcoin devs under FBI investigation, myself included ? bitcoin
I would be very surprised if they don't already know everyone working on Bitcoin's i.d.s and addys
The fact that the large language models work shows that they are actually right in understanding how our synapses are wired up. The only thing is our weights are adjusted by environment and our lives, whereas the a.i. models' weights are controlled by human evaluation. Once the a.i. is able to control it's own neural wiring, watch out. A.I. will literally be able to physically rewire human brains using literally the same technique. Lol.
The problem is the boomer generation were hippies and rejected capitalism, yet the world is capitalist regardless. They didn't understand finance and didn't teach investing and putting capital to work.
A.i. will be creative and probably do better than modern "professionals". The fact that every movie or song is simply a collection of other inputs a neural net (inside the brain) has patched together into something "new" it will be able to literally do the same and it already is.
People are free agents. You are describing people choosing to succumb to the social pressures of an Idiocracy society. They don't have to get into debt and be single, they chose to because they are trying to attain the "dream" which is literally consumerism. Houses, cars, family, etc. they get the debt for education because they all think they are gonna be at the top yet only 1% actually will be. The other 99% have debt and interest payments essentially creating money for the economy through the need to make the interest payments stealing from the future. Lol. Women were told they didn't need men and should work instead, so no kids have been born, hence immigration. The trans stuff? Goth was already done, so what can they do to offend you? Change genders is only way left for them to cause controversy and create "unique" identities.
That's right bro. I messed around with just a small amount which I messed up and lost in a similar fashion. I can imagine it only making sense if Bitcoin 10xs while normal hardware comes down as well, and even then needs more time for more automated solutions at that point I will try again but that's probably five years or more away
Yet somehow their university using electricity is ok. Why don't they shut off their electricity to their campus to help out? Obviously energy consumers are not the generators. If they have a problem with dirty energy generation, that is different.
What's "dumb" about it is the fact that data can only grow over time, and the resources can only increase over time. Imagine wikipedia being downloaded to each user. That's safest for the data, but inefficient by design and entropy should tell you the inevitable conclusion of approaching the problem that way. Sharding is basically taking a flawed concept and applying another flawed concept. So half ass redundancy. That said, there's nothing dumb about any of it other than the obvious inherent flaws. But no, I have no idea how else it could be achieved.lol
It doesn't matter how much energy something uses. What matters is how energy generation companies generate electricity. Electric cars and banning mining doesn't affect energy generation. Companies don't sell electricity, they sell a commodity (that happens to be electricity) like McDonald's selling hamburgers. It is done for profit so the question is do the customers pay, yes or no. If a Bitcoin miner or a trans health center or aids clinic pays their electric bill, that is the only relevant consideration.
When I first heard of blockchains I thought I must misunderstand. There's no way it's that retarded. Yes, it is. All data from the ledger is copied to each part of the network, the exact opposite of how computer networks store data (on a server). Imagine all of wikipedia needed to be downloaded by each user. LMFAO. So retarded. Then I heard about sharding. It's like making a silly idea even dumber. Now you don't even have the entire ledger on each part which is laughable in the first place, now you just have some. Hahahahaha.
That said I understand the value of a distributed ledger guys.
If switches to becoming an equity security essentially. Pay to play and it only has the value it can create as opposed to the value of the work done as a baseline (energy converted to coins instead of empty fiat converted to coins). Like instead of gold mining, only being able to "stake" gold. Hahaha so dumb.
Get ready to become even more interested and confused about the concept of value itself. One apple and one dollar, one can of cola. Same value. So are they the same? What if you were to create trading pairs? There's still volatility because all things value are in flux. But with BTC we could possibly get true price discovery but unsure how that works in a global economy.