pull down to refresh
149 sats \ 0 replies \ @frostdragon 29 Jan \ on: What's the story behind your nym? AskSN
nice try fed
Yep, this is a solid take.
I frequently wonder if the USG is just... unintentionally kneecapping themselves here? Or if there's something way worse going on.
Even without a hard fork, the idea of nations or even corporations accumulating bitcoin faster than the rest of us to the point that they own 90-95+% of all the bitcoins over time is a scary thought. In some ways that sounds worse than our current setup.
Intellectual property laws are not near as strict or enforceable as they are in the US, so that has something to do with it.
Either way, I think what SN has set up is probably the way of the future. Self custody and self sovereignty is just going to get easier with time IMO.
For government use only
*Uploads a selfie w/ blurry background from a vacation a few years ago to ChatGPT
*ChatGPT correctly identifies the city
To be completely honest, I think a lot of other territories are perfectly fine for posing questions, and they have specific topics defined. I think AskSN is probably too general to work well. Just my honest opinion.
That being said, I think it could be successful if a lot of effort is put into keeping up with it.
they would not agree with your definition of truth in this case - a Christian, for example, would claim that the virgin birth and the resurrection of Jesus are facts.
Engraving a seed phrase is a fun experience. My seed phrase has never been in view of a camera, never been spoken allowed, and has only been seen by me. It exists in a physical medium only, in a hidden location wrapped in a kind of makeshift tamper proof wrapping.
That is an awesome feeling.
Thatâs an interesting way to think about it. Most people tend to think of facts as something thatâs true, haha.
But your definition seems to imply that âtruthsâ arenât really absolute, theyâre like opinions on steroids, and are relative. Iâd love to hear more about what you think about this and what made you arrive at this conclusion.
12 sats \ 0 replies \ @frostdragon 18 Jan \ parent \ on: Supreme Court Upholds Law Banning TikTok news
True, but it's also spyware. And in the meantime there are dozens of platforms for speech on the same scale. It's not like this is restricting anyone from saying whatever they want to say to whoever they want to say it to. Doesn't seem like any political influencers are going to lose their audience, they'll just move somewhere else.
I don't see how any individual's rights are being violated here.
13 sats \ 2 replies \ @frostdragon 17 Jan \ parent \ on: Supreme Court Upholds Law Banning TikTok news
Why do you think this violates the first amendment?