pull down to refresh

@hynek
269,575 sats stacked
stacking since: #7075longest cowboy streak: 2
bio
264 items
by
for
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @hynek OP 8 Oct \ parent \ on: Proposal for Improving Wallet of Satoshi builders
Thanks @Khunsa, I appreciate your interest — but at the moment I don’t have the bandwidth to dive into it.
I just have a few quick notes:
  • At first glance, it’s not clear to me what problem the service is solving. I think the most effective next step would be to get your first paying customer (or use it primarily for yourself) and serve them well. It’s not necessarily important to have a perfectly clear website if it serves the target audience effectively.
  • I wasn’t able to register — after entering my email, I got an “Invalid credentials” error.
  • If this is a Bitcoin-related service, it would be nice to have Lightning login support.
Wishing you lots of success!
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @hynek 6 Oct \ on: (Q.) Wasabi Coinjoin Steps bitcoin_beginners
There are still unofficial but working solution with Trezor (top hardware wallet)
358 sats \ 1 reply \ @hynek 27 Sep \ on: Where Beer is Cheapest (and Most Expensive) in 2025 charts_and_numbers
Top quality and third cheapest.. Visit the Prague 🍻
Proposal for Improving Wallet of Satoshi
620 sats \ 6 comments \ @hynek 27 Sep builders
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @hynek 1 Jul \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Layer 2: Lightning Network lightning
Valid concerns.. I will still keep an eye on it.
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @hynek 1 Jul \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Layer 2: Lightning Network lightning
Are you really familiar with the Ark design? You are not sending bitcoin elsewhere and you are always able to withdraw the funds without permission.
I'm not commenting the marketing thou.. it's a bit suspicious.
33 sats \ 4 replies \ @hynek 1 Jul \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Layer 2: Lightning Network lightning
Ark is bitcoin just like Lightning.. Liquid, statechains, drivechains, etc. are not bitcoin
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @hynek OP 6 Jun \ parent \ on: Is it time to relay even transactions with fee rate lower than 1 sat/vB? bitcoin
Yes, but you are talking about fee rate. Fee is not in fractions of sats
  • By fee I mean sum_of_outputs-sum_of_inputs
  • By fee rate I mean fee/tx_vsize
202 sats \ 0 replies \ @hynek OP 6 Jun \ parent \ on: Is it time to relay even transactions with fee rate lower than 1 sat/vB? bitcoin
Exactly. And this could even help with the security budget because on-chain might become even more accessible. It's kind of free money for miners actually.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @hynek OP 5 Jun \ parent \ on: Is it time to relay even transactions with fee rate lower than 1 sat/vB? bitcoin
Good joke :-)
But the idea doesn't introduce fractional sats. It's very delicate change than any node runner can do.
104 sats \ 2 replies \ @hynek OP 5 Jun \ parent \ on: Is it time to relay even transactions with fee rate lower than 1 sat/vB? bitcoin
This doesn't help with scaling. But it could bring more granularity to fee market and keep it public.
I don't see the problem with the fraction. You still send whole amounts of sats. Fee rate is only a tool to compare the absolute fees. So in the example above, you could relay simple transaction (141 vB) for 2 sat →  0,014 sat/vB
Is it time to relay even transactions with fee rate lower than 1 sat/vB?
2668 sats \ 18 comments \ @hynek 5 Jun bitcoin
Your wealth is fading silently
226 sats \ 1 comment \ @hynek 31 May bitcoin
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @hynek OP 13 Feb \ parent \ on: Channel Factories fueled by Cashu bitcoin
Trust is used mainly to build the network.