We said no nukes. They were given 60 days and Israel struck them on day 61. Still today they said they would go to war over stopping the nuclear program. Welp FAFO
USA USA USA
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
1440 sats \ 24 replies \ @Undisciplined 22 Jun
Dude, they aren't the only ones fucking around and finding out. Have you been living under a rock for the entire disastrous War on Terror?
This was an unhinged and completely unnecessary act of war. Only weeks ago, the Trump administration confirmed that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons. Just because Bibi gets out his 30 year old diagram of a Wile E. Cayote bomb and claims Iran's "weeks away" for the 50th time doesn't mean anything.
What is this imperialistic garbage where America has the right to tell every nation on Earth that they have 60 days to comply with anything?
reply
0 new comment
26 sats \ 2 replies \ @Signal312 22 Jun
Is Trump compromised? Do they have something on him, an Epstein style revelation? I know he was on the island.
He was, previously, strong on "no new wars". I didn't expect this.
I guess my expectations for politicians should never be above zero.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
No this is an attack like Reagan did on Iran in the 80s there is no war that follows because Iran literally would fall and crumble. The overwhelming show of force gives them pause in doing anything stupid.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 22 Jun
That's far and away the most likely scenario to me. Plus, Elon stated it openly. If it weren't true, the easiest remedy would be to release the documents.
reply
0 new comment
1031 sats \ 20 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
This has no boots on the ground and no regime change calls.... entirely different then Iraq or Afghanistan
Plus ummm even the IAEA has said Iran was violating what they claimed since early 2000s
reply
0 new comment
111 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 22 Jun
This just started. Your party had a lot of support because Trump didn't get us into any new wars. That support was just lost, to a great extent.
Americans are sick of this shit and it's not going to end well for your warmongering comrades.
reply
0 new comment
121 sats \ 7 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Reagan did the exact same things.... twice.
You understand they have attacked American bases twice in the last week via their proxies in Iraq right? We were able to shot down the drones before hand but Iran was already acting out.
reply
0 new comment
658 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 22 Jun
Do you really want to compare the scope of American acts against Iran with their actions against America? You need to stop drinking the Kool Aid
Edit: Also, no one but Republican sycophants give a shit about what Reagan did 40 years ago. We are sick of the wars that people like you keep dragging us into.
reply
0 new comment
531 sats \ 5 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Sounds like you are the one drinking the Kool Aid...
Trump is calling for peace and is calling for it right now. Iran will you pick up the phone? No they wont because they want the US to impose its will on Israel which contradicts what you said about playing world police and forcing people to act one way or another. Israel can do its own stuff and so can the US its call independence
view all 5 replies
39 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 22 Jun
@remindme in 60 days
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 9 replies \ @petertodd 22 Jun
The IAEA found uranium enriched to 83% in 2023: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/01/middleeast/iran-uranium-enrichment-iaea-intl/index.html
Iran is clearly attempting to build nuclear weapons. There aren't civilian applications for uranium enriched beyond 20%. As it is, Iran has openly admitted to the IAEA that they're enriching to 60%.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 22 Jun
Yes, they've been open about enriching uranium for energy and medical purposes. That's not justification for anything.
By my understanding, they were complying with inspections while the Iran Deal was in place and have always been open to resuming those.
Stop falling for every dumb piece of war propaganda.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 7 replies \ @petertodd 22 Jun
Neither medical nor energy purposes need 60% enriched uranium. Certainly not 83%
Stop falling for dumb Iranian propaganda.
reply
0 new comment
14 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 22 Jun
Naval reactors do use that level of enrichment, unlike nuclear weapons.
view all 6 replies
66 sats \ 5 replies \ @south_korea_ln 22 Jun
In the end, they are all warmongers.
The US can't live without war.
reply
0 new comment
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Iran refused to come to the table. They did not feel like the US would do anything and thought that we would back off. We were not messing around Trump for a decade has said they cannot have a nuke and told them time and time again to stop.
The Supreme Leader is literally terrified hiding in a bunker and not communicating.
reply
0 new comment
39 sats \ 3 replies \ @south_korea_ln 22 Jun
Trump also said Obama to be a weak leader because he could not negotiate a resolution. Trump does the bidding of the industrial military complex, like any president before him. Spineless.
reply
0 new comment
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Spineless? Spineless would have been like Obama and let the Iranian Regime string you along. All that the Obama negotiation did was kick the can down the road. Now there is no road to kick it down.
This was wildly successful operational security.
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @028559d218 22 Jun
Maybe. Maybe not. The public will never really know.
Even the people in government aren't sure/can't be sure how successful dropping bombs on a side of a mountain will be.
reply
0 new comment
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Ummmm actually we are pretty freaking sure cause we dropped this bomb in Afghanistan for shits and giggles years ago and got to see what it would do. This isnt like the first time we have used it this is after we have used it multiple times lol
reply on another page
111 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichro 22 Jun
"No matter who you vote for, you're getting John McCain"
reply
0 new comment
65 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 22 Jun
US IMPERIALISM
Removed Irans democratically elected leader Mohammad Mosaddegh 73 years ago in order to continue exploiting Irans oil and gas resources along with Britain.
US wealth is built upon theft and murder of other nations wealth and people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @88b0c423eb 22 Jun
So more debt for usa citizens, more world hate on them and israel may not survive another winter.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0266eb2a47 22 Jun freebie
Let’s hope this war ends someday
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @SimpleStacker 22 Jun
Doesn't Congress have to approve acts of war?
reply
0 new comment
184 sats \ 6 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Congress has to approve war no acts of war. Obama drone striked countless countries without Congressional approval
reply
0 new comment
174 sats \ 5 replies \ @nichro 22 Jun
And it was unconstitutional when Obama did it as well
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Its not a war. This has been settled for decades. The War Powers Resolution mandates that the President must notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days without congressional authorization.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 22 Jun
So, when Iran nukes Israel, its still not a war.
Nice to know.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
So your admitting Iran built nukes violating not only the agreements they signed with the US but the UN… also that the Iranian leaders are lying? Pretty dumb viewpoint since that makes what Israel legitimate 😂
view all 2 replies
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 22 Jun
If Israel gets nuked you can't say they didn't ask for it.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Nuked by who? Are you implying that.... Iran has nukes?!?!
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 22 Jun
Are you calling Bull on Bibi?
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Iran had negotiating power by almost not quite having a nuke. That’s the whole reason for never completing it but you just said Iran was going to nuke Israel so your saying Babi was correct and thus the actions were justified 😂
You are blowing off your leg in this argument I’d suggest stopping now and not trying to make your contradictory views work when they can’t 😂
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 22 Jun
If Israel gets nuked you can't say they didn't ask for it.
Israel is a rogue state waging genocide upon Gaza.
The US has long enabled Israel to have nukes and is now complicit in their war crimes.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Cje95 OP 22 Jun
Genocide means you are trying to erase a population.... however Gaza's population has only increased. Learn what words mean before you use them.
view all 3 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 22 Jun
deleted by author