pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 7 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 18h \ on: Announcement: new Zerolink coinjoin coordinator bitcoin
Looks promising.
I would like even to have my own whirlpool to CoinJoin with only myself just to make it more difficult for normal people to follow the flow of money through my stack.
write
preview
115 sats \ 6 replies \ @DarthCoin 13h
New ashigaru whirlpool coordinator can de-anonymize users https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5547639.0
using whirpool is useless nowadays. Idk why (clueless) people still use this crap today.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 7h
Thanks for sharing.
If this bug were patched, that would increase privacy and anonymity , yes?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 7h
again... whirpool is useless. Use LN.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 7h
Why is it useless?
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 7h
Because now we have LN and is much better. Just think about this simple fact: through a single 1M sats channel I can coinjoin/ mix/ /whirlpool/whatever you want to call it... infinite amount of sats without any onchain trace.
If you do not realize how powerful is this, you still have a lot to learn about LN.
Coinjoin onchain is a matter of the past, from the pre-LN era...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 2h
Is receiving privacy on Lightning still non-existent or has that been fixed somehow? I know you have good sending privacy on lightning but invoices reveal the receiving node to the sender and to all relaying nodes, right?
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 6h
Yes, there is always so much more for me to learn.
How can you mix an infinite amount of sats through a 1 million Sat channel?
reply on another page