Should Bitcoin own the .bitcoin TLD it could be very useful and if consensus agreed how would you make it so?
pull down to refresh
pull down to refresh
Should Bitcoin own the .bitcoin TLD it could be very useful and if consensus agreed how would you make it so?
No, it would require a centralised authority to 'own it', and thus a shit show.
To add, we have namecoin. Which I thought was novel, but it didn't get enough legs.
deleted by author
deleted by author
Very interesting question. Hard to accomplish.
thanks DC I'm taking that as a compliment and you don't hand them out very often :)
deleted by author
deleted by author
That's like asking if HTTP should own the .web TLD.
Bitcoin is a protocol, not a person or organization.
I think he's asking exactly about being intergrated into the protocol and not about an institution group or foundation or company. Something like was namecoin in 2013.
Oh, ... like the .eth tards?
No, thank you. That's just stupid.
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
Lol, no one can own a TLD you're just renting it from ICANN
I cann or I cannot ;)
deleted by author
deleted by author
who tf is Bitcoin?
we are all Bitcoin
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author