pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 17 replies \ @CliffBadger 18h \ parent \ on: If you were an authoritarian leader, what weird things would you do? AskSN
Yes. Everyone has to pay for their own wifi.
Children usually only have access to wifi if their parents can afford it.
Many, probably most, parents, globally, cannot afford wifi.
All children deserve free education and the opportunity to develop their productive and creative potential- any government that ignores maximising the development of this huge source of wealth and well being is negligent.
reply
Nothing the government provides is free. They demand obedience in return.
reply
Good government invests in the wealth creation potential of its territory and people.
Everyone wins.
Without good government people cannot enjoy the security and property rights essential to a healthy productive economy and society.
Without good government you have chaos and law of the jungle.
People who say they don't want taxes and government have never lived where there are neither- they really should go to experience the reality of their Libertarian wet dreams and see for themselves but they never do because that would be facing reality...and they would not last long without the security and wealth government provides.
reply
My friend, if my country adopted your model of good government I'd be dead in a week for thoughtcrime. I'll take my chances with the jungle.
reply
You cannot explain the reasoning behind this comment.
Because it is not based on logic, but misrepresentation.
At best hyperbole, at worst, trolling.
You do this because your ideology cannot be easily defended with reason.
reply
Where's the hyperbole? Do you think the PRC is "good government"? If I were a citizen, would I be allowed to say the CCP is infested with demons? Because if you don't think such basic self-expression should be permitted then I can't take seriously your claims about how an ideal society should look.
reply
Where did I say such self expression shouldn't be allowed?
That's blatant misrepresentation.
You are taking comments from other posts/threads about economic performance and dropping them out of context into this post which is about education- that's deliberate misrepresentation.
If I acknowledge Chinas economic performance in the context of the contest for global hegemony between China and the west I am not saying I agree with Chinas policies on freedom of speech. You seem to think/infer it is. You are completely wrong.
You are incapable of a sequential good faith contest of ideas and so repeatedly stoop to blatant and crude misrepresentation because your ideology is incapable of a good faith debate.
You are misusing and abusing freedom of speech in a manner that undermines the process of a good faith contest of ideas- you are thus undermining reason, good faith and democracy.
reply
Politics isn't separable from economics. You said property rights need government force for protection, so what does that good government look like?