Good summary! I wasn’t trying to bring that whole discussion back, I just wanted to show that Google put a result for SN in second place. Kinda makes you wonder why Google did that?

![](https://m.stacker.news/107547)

0xbitcoiner

 to hurt, especially for big zaps since we don’t know if you’re zapping yourself.

this also means that two stackers that have equal trust have less impact together than individually. If one of them zaps 10k is more signal in this system than if both zap 5k. I think that’s the opposite of what we want unfortunately and sounds like a game breaker to this idea.

Stacker Saloon

saloon

> the intention behind the sybil fee _is_ to hurt, especially for big zaps since we don’t know if you’re zapping yourself.

-- https://stacker.news/items/748639?commentId=748657

> this also means that two stackers that have equal trust have less impact together than individually. If one of them zaps 10k is more signal in this system than if both zap 5k. I think that’s the opposite of what we want unfortunately and sounds like a game breaker to this idea.

-- https://stacker.news/items/748639?commentId=748836