pull down to refresh

140 sats \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10 Sep \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon

🤠


#748639

write
preview
33 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 10 Sep
the intention behind the sybil fee is to hurt, especially for big zaps since we don’t know if you’re zapping yourself.

-- #748657

this also means that two stackers that have equal trust have less impact together than individually. If one of them zaps 10k is more signal in this system than if both zap 5k. I think that’s the opposite of what we want unfortunately and sounds like a game breaker to this idea.

-- #748836

reply
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10 Sep

Good summary! I wasn’t trying to bring that whole discussion back, I just wanted to show that Google put a result for SN in second place. Kinda makes you wonder why Google did that?

reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 10 Sep

ouh, wow, that's crazy, thanks

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scoresby 10 Sep

It's the fourth result for me when googling "Sybil fee" -- but still really cool.

reply
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 10 Sep

For me it's 12th result -- on page 2.

First result was obituary for one Sybil Lorraine Fee. Others were more general information about sybil attacks, sybil resistance, and then a company called sybil-something.

Interestingly, SN is the first result that uses sybil fee in the context of fees for the purpose of building sybil resistance.

Did SN coin the term sybil fee?

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 10 Sep
Sybil Lorraine Fee

This lady's name is too good. I'm definitely going to look into this.

reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 10 Sep

that's cool we rank high for sybil fee. it's not a special word or anything. it's just a literal description. i guess it's just not something that's very common yet.

reply