pull down to refresh

No, even if beings are to a large extent a genetic sequence, they are more than that. It's not rational exactly, but I think this kind of dishonors the original pet by replacing them in a more precise way.
There was a good article in the atlantic that I shared awhile ago: #996347
77 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 12h
I agree.
For the owner, they're depriving themselves of novelty and the kind of appreciation they'll get for their deceased pet when contrasted with a new one.
reply
This reminds me of a book called Klara and the Sun. I think I will post a review of it on stacker news
reply
Yeah, I can see your point. You think the same about cloning camels and racehorses?
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 12h
No, because I'm not cloning out of grief in those cases
reply