Assuming Bitcoin is eating fiat which funds governments that enforces the law, does this imply theres a decent likelihood of a lawless near future?
The Premise: gov runs out of $
As we know a legal declaration has less enforceable power on bitcoin vs gold or land. And since the courts are funded by the state I believe it could effectively end as an institution when the money printer is gone. Code and capitalism might be the only "laws" that survive...
Speaking from a US perspective (though it should apply for similar countries like Germany, China et al) the government is going to run out of "value" even if they can print infinite paper. Tax as a percentage of GDP is capped by Laffer Curve and govs are already maxed out there.

Thanks to pure fiat inflation linked to the ability to issue infinite debt (for now) countries are currently able to extract more value from us plebians. However, when Bitcoin hyper-inflates fiat it also eliminates the ability of the government to issue debt. Since Cantillon banks are backstopped by the Fed the lack of money printer would probably take most of them down too.
(maybe they would have evolved into some form of stablecoin or bitcoinized lender by then. either way debt vs world assets would to be far lower than the 4:1 ratio of today)
Without the printer or ability to issue new debt the only way for the gov to fiscally survive is massive downsizing. Based on the current budget breakdown (particularly entitlements and defense) - I estimate the US would have a likely forced reduction by roughly 2/3 (30% spending remains) to "fit" within the taxable base.
However as we know politics is irrational and not swayed by simple maths...
Democratic voters aren't incentivized to care about "the budget" since fiscal costs are socialized and they want individual benefits. Thus in the US we've voted spending into laws no politician will cut (else they are voted out). Even if they tried to adapt bureaucracy slows reaction time down further meaning its unlikely they could adapt fast enough if they tried at all.
The Endgame: gov loses monopoly on force
That premise leaves me seeing no feasible way at least US and similar big fiat govs would able to rebalance smoothly. At a minimum I see them defaulting on all their debts and downsizing rapidly. Avik Roy of Bitcoin Policy Institute estimates this will occur around the late 2030s - mid 2040s. He seems to be more optimistic about the continuity of the US in that scenario (need to read his source material). Though in my view rapid shrinking at the cost of every voter benefit and national security is a few riots away from full system collapse.
(side note: read Joseph Tainter collapse of complex societies shows historical analogues)
Social Darwinian AnCaps might argue that even if a public entity like a gov survives all that, it should always fail eventually relative to a private entity given enough time on a hard money standard. Though, perhaps a government could survive as a "night watchman" or a "tourism state" as outlined in the Sovereign Individual. Either way it will have lost most or all of its ability to enforce anything on Bitcoin hodling citizens.
All this leads me to conclude that the odds of an enforceable legal system continuing indefinitely or even through our lifetimes seems unlikely. And I like society! I want to believe the bitcoin transition can be graceful but according to this logic you shouldn't bet on it.
But I'm sure I've missed things in my attempted reasoning here... What do you think?