What do you do when a co-author who is supposed to give a full review of a manuscript draft comes back with 3 typos, and then, complements it with: "Additionally, I am attaching below an AI generated critical report which is clearly biased, yet can give some guidance on points to be improved if possible at all at this stage. Apart from those substantial improvement suggestions that we cannot incorporate right now, the manuscript seems to me keeps a good standard as is.".

Yet, when you read the AI-report, you realize neither the AI, nor the co-author has a clue of what is actually being conveyed in the manuscript. If the author had read the paper, he'd have realized all the "substantial" improvement suggestions are just garbage.

There is no shame anymore. #AIslop