That’s unnecessary if support for RDTS remains as marginal as expected. Miners could also use invalidateblock on the first block of the RDTS chain to ignore the RDTS chain permanently; no fork necessary.
Running invalidateblock in the manner you described is a consensus rule change (soft fork, introduction of a new rule) that targets RDTS, so.. Yes, that's what I meant.
That’s unnecessary if support for RDTS remains as marginal as expected. Miners could also use
invalidateblockon the first block of the RDTS chain to ignore the RDTS chain permanently; no fork necessary.