pull down to refresh
Same energy:
It seems to me that this is all predicated on having a majority of hashrate. My frustration has been with an argument that goes: "We don't need a majority of hashrate because we will eventually get a majority of hashrate."
"We don't need a majority of hashrate because we will eventually get a majority of hashrate."
That’s it: you have distilled the essence of the RDTS fallacy perfectly.
Same energy:
It seems to me that this is all predicated on having a majority of hashrate. My frustration has been with an argument that goes: "We don't need a majority of hashrate because we will eventually get a majority of hashrate."