pull down to refresh

300 sats \ 6 replies \ @BallLightning 28 Jan \ parent \ on: dathonohm releases BIP 110/RDTS activation client v0.1 bitcoin

This is not a hard fork. Also you can "fork yourself" and you have money in both branches, so no risk for you actually (you can wait as long as you want and see who wins).

write
preview
38 sats \ 5 replies \ @028559d218 28 Jan

It's a hard fork, they just somehow think they're 'going to win'.
The bcashers thought the same

reply
110 sats \ 2 replies \ @BallLightning 28 Jan

It's a soft fork.

reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 28 Jan

A soft fork can still produce a chain split.

If miners do not enforce BIP 110, nodes running BIP 110 will fork off from the main chain in September.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BallLightning 28 Jan

Yeah, I know.

reply
360 sats \ 1 reply \ @dathon_ohm 28 Jan

BIP-110 is much closer to Segwit than to BCH, given that Segwit was a softfork, while BCH was a hardfork.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Filiprogrammer 28 Jan

True.
And also BCH enabled much bigger blocks, which hurts decentralization. Meanwhile BIP-110 aims to do the opposite by reducing block bloat caused by inscriptions.
So the comparison to BCH makes no sense.

reply