pull down to refresh

It's all about downzapping for the wrong reasons!

What's a wrong reason?

reply

Someone is targeting Den's posts because he doesn't have an attached sending wallet. A lot of his posts have 1,000+ upzaps but also 800+ downzaps and so they're not showing up in Hot

Not sure if this is happening to other users as well

reply

It’s not just Dan’s posts! Even @Undisciplined got hit. Told you! ~lol
Salomon’s mad 😂 more sats for me. Got 1.7k sats today just from downzaps (26,659).

last day top list bottom:

reply
33 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 2h

worse. @btcpp got hit.

reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 2h

even worse. @0xbitcoiner got hit ~lol

reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 2h

worst outcome haha

reply

Do they understand who receives those rewards sats?

Thanks bud

reply

I did. It didn't make up for what I zapped extra though... but whatever.

reply

My meta post just got downed. also...

reply
also...

Like the jpeg spammers... they'll eventually run out of money... right?

reply

Naw. Look ma I got a gun

reply
202 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b 12h

I'm thinking of allowing folks to toggle on the horse/gun from their settings - no wallet required. We've also been wanting to only display them on profile pages for clutter reasons.

Also, I'm implementing #1406989 this week which should help in fighting fits of irrationality - past downzaps are on unequal footing with current upzaps.

reply

I think it's too much tuning.

The main issue is that one divisive sociopath downzaps more than 1/3rd of the upzaps with a smile without it hurting.

reply
100 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 11h

Making weight of zaps = weight of downzaps = weight of boost is another thing we're considering. But it makes defense 3x more expensive for the same provable sacrifice. It's tricky.

I'm implementing things we were planning to implement anyway, because they get at the issue obliquely. If that's not enough, we'll go a more direct route.

they might be going after everyone without a horse/gun.

you know what's funny? you can have a horse/gun even if your wallet is down and not working.

reply
67 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 12h

Yeah. I already made that point but people insist on dumb emojis.

reply

I've targeted his posts on the ⚡️ side

reply
166 sats \ 7 replies \ @Scoresby 11h

That is a lot of downzaps.

If we are going to use money as the moderator, we become vulnerable to whatever people want to spend sats to say (or downzap).

Currently downzaps are pretty powerful. Seems like we may need some balancing in the power of zaps.

reply
214 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 10h

money is the (mother fucking) moderator™️

reply

This really is a microcosm of the attention economy. This wouldn't matter so much if Hot wasn't basically the prime attention allocator.

Even if I set my visibility filter to -1,000, downzapped posts are still effectively invisible to me due to my inability to maintain perfect attention. I'd have to catch them on Recent about the time they're posted. (My other option is to find a comment worth clicking on when I do Recent -> Comments which then helps me find the post.)

reply

Hot and top are broken, recent is the way to go. That’s what I’ve been doing ever since I joined SN.

reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 10h
the prime attention allocator

I had been thinking about this mostly as a problem of how zaps and downzaps work, but it is interesting to wonder about solutions that give stackers different ways to decide how to allocate their attention.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 10h

master branch has a -inf filter minimum. I'll deploy it tomorrow

reply

What doesn’t really make sense is a post getting 1,000 up sats from 10 people, and then one person with 333 down sats being able to cancel it out. That needs to be rethought.

reply

The solution is to zap more and zap often.

reply