pull down to refresh

137 sats \ 60 replies \ @optimism 16h -154 sats \ on: Stacker Saloon

So... we're letting trolls silence anyone that opposes them? What's this, SN?

If your main priority in life is in pleasing your CCP handlers by donating relentlessly to Stackers, then ....

reply
102 sats \ 6 replies \ @optimism 13h

The problem is that we let good content get removed. I don't like that we're letting that happen.

reply
100 sats \ 5 replies \ @Scoresby 13h

yes, good posts getting buried is not cool

reply
22 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 13h

Most importantly, the opposition got buried. That's the worst part of it all.

reply

Agreed. I just wish my coffers were as limitless as his (i know they are not).

Hiding our cowboy gear might be a decent enough defense if enough people catch on.

reply
124 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 13h

There is a possibility that he's got paid to attack SN. Could be a psyop, or just autism (probably autism.) Either way, no bueno.

reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @billytheked 13h

Could be both. Somewhere he wrote that he's paid by the CCP, hence my earlier comment. I take him at his word.

In either case, agree. Find something better to do with your sats besides being disruping to others.

reply

Whoops, there I opened my mouth and became a target. c'est la vie

I have put forward the reasoned arguments supporting my actions...many many times and well before taking more direct action.

Nobody has ever responded with any convincing reason why they cannot attach wallets and show a gun and horse thus providing PoW that they support and have made the effort to engage in the P2P sats denominated V4V ethos that SNs has been built upon.

Invite you to provide such a retort and would reconsider my views if that retort is convincing.

In turn will resist attempts to bully, marginalise or troll against me.
Have put forward a reasoned argument that has yet to be refuted.

The contest of ideas is the foundation upon which a lot of our supposed shared values are based upon- use it.

Do not trust - verify.

reply

You have only ONE task: pay me

reply

I have put forward the reasoned arguments supporting my actions...many many times and well before taking more direct action.
Nobody has ever responded with any convincing reason why they cannot attach wallets and show a gun and horse thus providing PoW that they support and have made the effort to engage in the P2P sats denominated V4V ethos that SNs has been built upon.
Invite you to provide such a retort and would reconsider my views if that retort is convincing.
In turn will resist attempts to bully, marginalise or troll against me.
Have put forward a reasoned argument that has yet to be refuted.
The contest of ideas is the foundation upon which a lot of our supposed shared values are based upon- use it.

reply

C&P troll

reply

You appear incapable of responding to a reasoned argument with a credible reasoned retort.
You thus concede defeat, by default, in the contest of ideas.

reply
121 sats \ 16 replies \ @optimism 16h

No. I already discussed this with you. You actually never provided an answer for running a non-custodial solution with code that you reviewed and can actually recommend.

I don't concede anything, and I don't C&P.

reply

Why do you need to use a self custodial wallet?
I suggested you use coinos as that is so easy even I can use it!
Only keep a small balance in coinos and you are fine.
Yes there is a small risk with trusting custody to a wallet but there are equally risks and problems with self custodial.

Even @DarthCoin with his huge knowledge of LN claims that attaching self custodial wallet to SNs would stress his nodes- if he cannot do it easily at this stage of LN development probably few can...so we must use what we can use and by doing so support the development of the LN.

When using SNs everyday we are often making multiple small transactions.
If we attach wallets each and every transaction is supporting the growth of the network making it and the wallets and nodes stronger.

If we support the wallets they have the fees income and volume to grow and develop.
Coinos is apparently now introducing a self custodial wallet.
Do we want to use what we have got and strengthen the LN, or not?

I will C&P when morons like @Darthcoin respond to a detailed reasoned argument with childish memes and trolling that completely ignore the facts and issues raised in my comment they are 'responding' to. Not.

Am trying to remind him I would prefer a constructive reasoned debate, and failing that, highlighting that he appears incapable of such.

reply
Coinos

We had that discussion before too... it's an insecure, uninsured bank. If I had to choose between sucking saylor dick and using that shit, I'd suck saylor dick. And I fucking hate saylor.

Why do you need to use a self custodial wallet?

Because banks are evil, and Bitcoin banks are evil squared. And yes, coinos gets hacked every other month. They are an atrocity. If you want CCs to go away then fix it and do the pull request here.

Do we want to use what we have got and strengthen the LN, or not?

Not at the cost of downzapping credible items on SN. I'm here for the discourse with stand up people. You're downzapping their posts out of some misplaced activism because you need attention. Now I have less discourse, except with your stupid copy paste replies.

hey moron, did you read SN FAQ page?
It explain very simple how CCs works. If you cannot understand it, please STFU ifiot.

reply
77 sats \ 28 replies \ @Undisciplined 16h -100 sats

money is the moderator