pull down to refresh

I would suggest that you first address the points @Scoresby raised in the OP, but beyond that for starters:

  • You are wrong about the fork activating immediately upon reaching the threshold
  • It makes no sense to claim that miners should signal late. If they support the proposal signaling early would help build momentum and be less risky.
  • You misrepresent the potential downsides of being on the wrong side of the soft fork attempt
103 sats \ 2 replies \ @melvincarvalho 18 Feb -142 sats

Scoresby's critique assumes that BIP-110 could fail to activate, but it can't. There's no timeout or "failed" state. Mandatory signaling forces lock-in at max_activation_height, regardless of organic support. The chain-split scenarios described rely on minority hashrate activation, but the 55% threshold prevents this.