pull down to refresh
Content consumers like me may not feel inclined to support content providers who can't be bothered attaching LN wallets which verify that they are on board and supporting the LN and sats denominated ethos of SNs as much as possible.
If you show attached wallets then you will be automatically using the LN and sats as much as is possible under the current C/C / sats hybrid model.
If you do not you almost certainly are not.
'BTC Maxi living on The Bitcoin Standard' @DarthCoin for example admits preferring C/Cs to sats and refuses to attach LN wallet because 'C/Cs always work'.
The great majority of SNs regulars have attached and show they have attached LN wallets.
A small minority of content providers who posture as serious Bitcoiners and spout content heavy on Bitcoin adoption rhetoric are not attaching or showing attached LN wallets.
They are hypocrits.
None of them, after weeks of me raising this issue, has given a single credible reason for not attaching, using and showing they are using attached LN wallets.
Even if a user doesn’t have an attached wallet, isn’t it possible they’re paying LN invoices when it comes time to post or comment? Therefore making your whole one man campaign moot?