pull down to refresh

A century after Erwin Schrödinger sketched out a bold vision for how we perceive color, scientists have finally filled in the missing pieces. A Los Alamos team used advanced geometry to show that hue, saturation, and lightness aren’t shaped by culture or experience — they’re built directly into the mathematical structure of how we see color. By defining a crucial missing element known as the “neutral axis,” the researchers repaired a long-standing flaw in Schrödinger’s model and even corrected tricky visual quirks like the way brightness can subtly shift perceived hue.

I'm always a bit irked when I see this nature versus nurture opposition. I understand why it's there in popular speech, but every nurture response is inherently set by nature. There is no mystical force at play. It's just that a lot of emerging properties look like they cannot be explained from first principles. But that's just a limitation of our models and thinking.

Light has always been considered something set by biology (or here, math). It's nice that the math works out better now, but it's not a revolutionary insight into how we understand light. I think.

reply