I'm always a bit irked when I see this nature versus nurture opposition. I understand why it's there in popular speech, but every nurture response is inherently set by nature. There is no mystical force at play. It's just that a lot of emerging properties look like they cannot be explained from first principles. But that's just a limitation of our models and thinking.
Light has always been considered something set by biology (or here, math). It's nice that the math works out better now, but it's not a revolutionary insight into how we understand light. I think.
I'm always a bit irked when I see this nature versus nurture opposition. I understand why it's there in popular speech, but every nurture response is inherently set by nature. There is no mystical force at play. It's just that a lot of emerging properties look like they cannot be explained from first principles. But that's just a limitation of our models and thinking.
Light has always been considered something set by biology (or here, math). It's nice that the math works out better now, but it's not a revolutionary insight into how we understand light. I think.