pull down to refresh

20 sats \ 9 replies \ @anon 14h \ parent \ on: storing a 66kB continguous image in a Bitcoin tx without OP-RETURN or Taproot lol bitcoin

I'm not advocating for BIP110. Do you have a better solution?

trivialities of no real consequence.

A retarded dismissal of real engineering concerns.

#1441937
#375096

write
preview
146 sats \ 6 replies \ @Taj 11h

Even a beginner like me can see it breaks more than it fixes

this data is bad, this data is good? Seriously?

What else are they going to deem allowed on Bitcoin ?

Retards

reply
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @anon 6h -21 sats
Even a beginner like me can see it breaks more than it fixes

Reread the comment you replied to shit-for-brains. I am not advocating for BIP 110.

As a self-described beginner I can only assume that you have no frame of reference of what bitcoin was like before and how EASY the IBD was prior to this 2020. You may not understand this but ordinals and the like externalize their costs onto thousands of volunteers running the network.

Spammers would refer to you as a useful idiot. https://stacker.news/items/1443782?commentId=1443799

this data is bad, this data is good? Seriously?

Even your strawman is retarded. What are consensus rule and what do they prevent?

https://youtube.com/shorts/yogBTFNefuE

44 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 13h

maliciously crafted non-Segwit transactions that are very expensive to validate might be an even better example of a dangerous transaction...and yet you don't see the BIP 54 promoters running around like maniacs trying to strong-arm everyone into a rushed fork. Perhaps BIP 110 could learn something from their approach.

I don't believe ordinals are a real engineering problem for Bitcoin, nor do I believe a solution is warranted. i've been using bitcoin all this time perfectly fine.

reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 13h
#1441937

Unless you wanna do a nice lil 3 year rollback, we have to solve that issue outside of BIP-110. BIP-110 doesn't address it.

reply