pull down to refresh
From my perspective we can all help LN scale by using it.
Here on SNs we can attach LN wallets and thereby maximise our use of LN to pay for posts, comments and zaps.
There is a lot of hypocrisy on this by some 'Bitcoiners' who refuse to attach wallets here or only attach receiving wallets so they can acquire sats from the site while mostly not using LN or sats but instead mostly using inhouse CC tokens.
@Darthcoin is the most extreme example of this hypocrisy, often posting highly technical info about LN and BTC but refusing to attach any LN wallets and thereby all his transactions here are done without using LN or sats.
I have even mused maybe he is a mole sent here by the NSA to posture as a Bitcoiner while in reality acquiring inside knowledge of the community and the LN/BTC network technical aspects because his words certainly do not align with his actions.
He is actively opposing the use of and development of the LN by boycotting the use of LN here- and he has many devoted followers who appear to look up to him and buy his serial trolling bullshit and hypocrisy.
He have only 6000 posts. Did you read them all?
You will find a lot of knowledge about Bitcoin and LN in there...
Really? He’s only shared about 350 posts, and fewer than 20 have pass 1,000 sats in zaps. The rest mostly seem like replies directed at you. This thread is going out of topic, I'll wait for the knowledgeable of @Solomonsatoshi response in regard my question.
QED
It seems his comments primarily reference you, suggesting a bit of back-and-forth finger-pointing.
Setting that aside, my main question concerns Bitcoin’s scalability. @Solomonsatoshi, what’s your perspective on how Bitcoin can effectively scale to meet future transaction demands?