pull down to refresh

That's comparable to them having custodial solution, no?

121 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 9 Jul

worse
One thing is to just say the truth - "its custodial"
Another thing is to LIE your users, telling them is "self-custodial" when is not, is a lame sidechain. Somebody wants to make a business from all these submarine swaps and take control of the majority of bitcoin users and that is Marcus family. People forget WHO they are...

Nothing wrong with custodial services, as long as the user know the risks.

reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @nout 9 Jul

Fair, makes sense.

reply