pull down to refresh

remove freebies

Freebies is technically only detrimental to territory-specific control, but side-wide, as long as there are 1 sat comments, it doesn't make that much difference. There still is a per-territory allowFreebies field in the db, it is just not linked up to the configuration afaict. Maybe that would be a better solution than nuking the feature completely.

There are 5 freebies per account per month, so it is only a real bother for sybil account bots. The cost of a new account is technically the cpu time of generating a nostr key though - i.e. cheap. However, limiting the freebies site-wide is probably too obstructive to new, blank users. Need an entry point somehow.

could we just make it so freebies can be zapped, which can affect their visibility, but they don't earn any sats? (100% of freebie zaps go to rewards)

reply

That destroys the entry point.

How will you make your first sat ever, on SN?

reply

Talk to people on SN and figure out how to get bitcoin and create a lightning wallet.

reply

Right, so goodwill instead of merit. Fine... but then: how do I extract sats from every person that sponsored a bot to post slop that I then had to downzap even more?

reply

no, I didn't mean beg for your first sats. I mean connect your own lightning wallet and use your own bitcoin that you got from somewhere else (or use them to buy CCs)

but the idea is that you can still talk to people here even if you don't know how to do all that. you just won't earn any tips until you actually pay to post

reply
use your own bitcoin

But I asked about

your first sat ever

Which implies you don't have any sats. That's what I understand the freebies to be for: to introduce people to Bitcoin that before coming to SN have never interacted with it. Like organic orange pilling.

reply

If they come here without having any bitcoin, and they enjoy the conversation here, they can learn from the users here how to buy their own bitcoin, then use that to acquire CCs or connect a wallet and start posting for real

reply

Personally, I'd be saddened if "buy it" becomes the only alternative to "earn it". But that's just me, being a foreign debanked monkey worth less than the average roll of US toilet paper with no future and even less prestige to cling on to.

couldn't we do this:

if you zap a post which a number of other stackers then downzap, you lose some ranking in the reward pool

I'm not so good with the permutations of how things have changed, but i think I remember a time when we had something like this dynamic with trust. If trust gets reintroduced, I could see this working. Without trust it would be vulnerable to a sock puppet attack.

reply
2154 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kruw 24 Jul

Absolutely not. This incentivizes the formation of organized gangs to loot the reward pool.

reply
103 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 24 Jul

The reward pool still has trust, unless I missed a recent commit

reply

you are correct. I was getting my wires crossed.

reply
442 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kruw 24 Jul

By.... using Bitcoin :)

reply