pull down to refresh

1 sat \ 5 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 13 Aug \ parent \ on: Removing Luke Dashjr as a BIP editor is a sign of bitcoin centralization. bitcoin

I don’t know anything about Luke as a BIP editor. Has he ever fucked up?

write
compose
947 sats \ 1 reply \ @Murch 17 Aug

E.g., when the Taproot authors wanted to amend their BIP to propose a deployment mechanism, he obstructed the update even after all three authors had signed off on it, because he favored a different deployment mechanism. He had also done next to no BIP Editor work in five years. If you don’t do the work, you don’t need the privileges necessary to do the work.

reply
1742 sats \ 0 replies \ @Murch 17 Aug

I listed some other grievances in my second email on the mailing list thread: https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/knbv3MFwlvU

reply
246 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 13 Aug

Let's say your wife went on rampant fucking every dude around and also went against your family.
Do you still keep her in your house?

reply
103 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 13 Aug

I thought Bitcoin didn’t have a home, a husband, or a family!

reply
103 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarrelXero 13 Aug

Bitcoin doesn't, but the institution that exists for BIP administration does.

reply