pull down to refresh

Here's a political development I didn't expect to see...Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the original "squad" leader, is apparently too moderate for part of the Democratic Socialists of America. The DSA's Liberation Caucus, a faction that openly describes itself as Marxist-Leninist-Maoist, is rejecting the idea of AOC becoming the socialist movement's presidential standard-bearer in 2028.

Why? They say she's retreating from socialist politics. They're angry about her positions surrounding Israel and Palestine. They're angry that she's backed away from the "defund the police" politics of 2020. And they weren't amused when AOC recently looked back at that era and joked that "Woke 1 was crazy." The caucus went considerably further, calling her an "opportunist dilettante" and arguing she's no longer sufficiently committed to socialist principles.

There's a larger fight happening here that's worth watching. AOC built her national reputation as one of the most prominent figures on America's political left. Now, as speculation grows about a possible 2028 presidential run, she's showing signs of trying to broaden her appeal and some of the activists to her left aren't interested in coming along.

That's a fascinating problem for AOC...how do you move toward the political center enough to compete nationally without losing the movement that helped make you a national figure in the first place? When even AOC is getting attacked for being too moderate, you get a pretty good idea of just how far left the progressive movement has become.

Ironically, I’m in full agreement with the commies on this one.

reply

I think it's pretty obvious to anyone who even marginally follows this stuff that AOC is nothing but an opportunist and a grifter

reply

Yeah, compromising to get anything done is a bitch. No matter how much a zealot someone is politically from any direction, to get anything done you have to work with people. What a foreign concept, LOL.

reply

That presumes that something is better than nothing, which is not a given for state action

reply

Not necessarily. Keeping the status quo can oftentimes be a viable strategy versus change that makes no sense or would create more damage.

reply

Fair enough. No disagreement there.

reply

Ahem...@Yermin...zealot...cough, cough...

reply

Call me a zealot @JRem , but here's why I won't budge "The Navy May Replace a Black War Hero With a Sitting President"

reply

A spade is a spade...

reply

They…once…called us ‘spades,’ too. Which is kind of the point.

reply

Come on. “Call a spade a spade” is a centuries-old expression that pre-dates your reference. Turning that into a racial issue is actually the point...a zealot.

reply

Fair point on the phrase. But if opposing the replacement of Doris Miller with a sitting president makes me a zealot, argue that, not the label.

reply

You made that post after I called you a zealot, had nothing to do with it...lol, classic shifty @Yermin