pull down to refresh

WEEK 5 MINING POOL RESULTS:

Most profitable:

-1.73% | Foundry (5 week streak)
-2.00% | ViaBTC
-2.47% | MARA Pool (4 week streak)

Least profitable:

-23.44% | BTC.com (2 week streak)
-21.15% | OCEAN (5 week streak)
-10.28% | Binance Pool

Leading censors:
88.19% | BTC.com
91.26% | OCEAN (5 week streak)
96.07% | Poolin (2 week streak)

What is a block's "Health" score calculated from?

Every time a block is mined, mempool.space takes a snapshot of the most profitable block template that could have been constructed by the miner. Whenever a pool excludes a high fee paying transaction, their "health" metric is damaged. A pool with a low health score means they are either censoring, or their node is not well connected to the rest of the network.

I'm enjoying this series. Thank you.

What is the censors score made up from?

reply
74 sats \ 2 replies \ @Kruw OP 23h

The Censors leaderboard ranks which pool has the worst block health %.

reply
214 sats \ 1 reply \ @unboiled 23h

Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying that.

So, just to be clear, we're not expecting ineptitude in template selection, but attribute deviation from the theoretical optimum as censorship, right?
Could we be missing some legitimate deviations or is the expectation that, if legitimate ones did exist, those wouldn't make a dent either way?

reply
21.2k sats \ 0 replies \ @Kruw OP 55m
Could we be missing some legitimate deviations or is the expectation that, if legitimate ones did exist, those wouldn't make a dent either way?

Legitimate deviations might appear if the pool is accepting out of band payment for transactions.

reply

i think btc.com still runs a node that only accepts 1 sat/vbyte transactions. So, they jumped ahead of Ocean just on that node function (although maybe that means they are also still at 83 bytes max for data too) and also actually finding some blocks for this week's report.

reply
80 sats \ 1 reply \ @Kruw OP 5h

I just checked: BTC.com used to accept txs below 1 sat/vbyte, but they no longer do.

reply

hmm, odd

reply
61 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 4h

@siggy47 are you still mine with ocean ?

reply
104 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 1h

Yes. I don't have many options as a small, non lottery miner. It really comes down to Ocean, Braiins, and I guess DMND now. Ocean is the only completely non custodial option. Brains offers LN payouts too, but I don't like that you have to create an account and it's not as private. I also prefer TIDES payout. DMND might be good, but no lightning. I really don't care about the custom templates offered by both Ocean and DMND.

reply
40 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 1h

reeelax... I am just busting your balls man :)

reply

I know, but I do like comparing the few pools who cater to non lottery small miners. I hope there will be a lot more of us soon.

reply