pull down to refresh

Did I ever say Black federal overrepresentation came from race-based DEI? No.

I explicitly tied it to civil-service rules, employment protections and anti-discrimination enforcement.

My DEI point was separate: this administration is also dismantling other pathways designed to widen opportunity.

You keep combining two different parts of the argument.

My main argument is the one I made in the post: taken together, Trump is governing like he believes civil rights have treated white people “very badly.”

Nope, I'm attacking your federal DEI point specifically. You complain Trump ended federal DEI programs. Your own numbers show Black workers are already significantly overrepresented federally, so it doesnt matter that the government ended them because they are not needed.

The rest of your post is irrelevant. As stated in other threads with you, I only expose bad facts or twisted narratives...and yours is surrounding the federal workforce.

reply

Throwout the federal DEI point then. The laundry list is still valid, and shortened even, and the argument is sound.

reply

Thank you! I don't really care about the rest. My point has remained that if federal workers are overrepresented, then they dont need DEI stuff. Private sector, keep/pay for it if they want too.

reply