> PS: Your depth graph is not a depth graph. You need to invert the bids and you need max order size, not min.

Sweet details, thanks. Just implemented https://4g0r4.github.io/cc-sat/

Your calc says (ask side):

> Trading 1,000 CC: you pay **1000 sats** and receive **700 CC** (300 CC lost to the 30% fee).

so that's worse than this offer. It's also listed at the bottom of the book (correctly so). The bid side is of course the best offer, because that matches k00b's at a loss for the maker. But Darth "left", so is it even actual?

PS: Your depth graph is not a depth graph. You need to invert the bids and you need max order size, not min.

----

Edit, cuz forgot to answer:

> is just for simplicity?

No, I think it is what surplus means. Read the post. bullish has CCs they don't need. That's it. They're liquidating them.

optimism

That's a good point, do you think his 0.5 sats/CC rate is just for simplicity? I thought the best offer was the one from 

AGORA

deleted by author

That's a good point, do you think his 0.5 sats/CC rate is just for simplicity? I thought the best offer was the one from @Darthcoin, 1sat per CC. is selling at loss.