30 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 11 Apr 2023
We should spam with faxes all politicians.
Just send Bitcoin papers.
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 11 Apr 2023
Whitepaper for you. Whitepaper for you. And Whitepaper for you too
reply
15 sats \ 1 reply \ @franzap 11 Apr 2023
Has anyone got Paul Krugman's fax number?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 12 Apr 2023
Lol that would be epic
reply
11 sats \ 8 replies \ @dtonon 11 Apr 2023
Spam this!
https://iris.to/npub1fax000k83detv7fjpm7v2y2dj9q4tmg2yghv3fh44uv2540ta0sqjw7e5p
(My silly "old tech" inclusive project)
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @sime 12 Apr 2023
This is awesome. I have a one pager shilling Bitcoin Fax somewhere, will dig for it and fax it through.
I'm excited by the circular Bitcoin>Fax>Nostr economy we are building for ourselves.
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @sime 13 Apr 2023
Spammed.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @dtonon 13 Apr 2023
Thanks! But I cannot see it.
Which number did you sent to?
The current active one is +3904341851001
Just tried to fax it and worked.
Old notes have a not more working number, I realized later that was a bad idea to include it on a note!
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @sime 14 Apr 2023
Same number.
I got an error during transmission. Do you see failed faxes?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @dtonon 14 Apr 2023
Unlucky I cannot see them.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @sime 14 Apr 2023
Tried again, error during transmission.
Curious. It is a physical fax machine, dialup modem or online fax service?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @dtonon 15 Apr 2023
I'm using an online fax service. Did you used a fax machine? Perhaps some glitches with tone/pulse config?
I have an old US Robotics handy, but today it's not easy to route a spare (and updatable) number to a physical RJ11 port.
view replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kakocuro 12 Apr 2023
Faxing is still a thing? I don't know anybody who uses this technology.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sime 12 Apr 2023
Thanks for sharing my little project :)
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @timechain 11 Apr 2023
Hey there, I posted about this on nostr, someone tried it to Norway where it should be 20 cents. It was closer to 6 dollars.
Perhaps there is a minimum charge?
Anyway this note includes a screenshot of the price that it was asking for for 1 page to Norway. (I blurred out the dude's fax number)
note1tqh375378wuhwsej26hfsmc878mp67hr3k34rer0c8gpda9qwxmqfz6tkf
Couldn't find any mention of a minimum charge anywhere on the site tho.
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @BeardedSaintRef OP 11 Apr 2023
I looked up your note and saw the image. I see the price chart on the link. Not sure why it went up so quick. That’s a crazy price though….I’d send an email and ask for assistance
-hello@bitcoinfax.net
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @timechain 11 Apr 2023
Yeah, it's someone else's, he's already not feeling it.
reply
10 sats \ 4 replies \ @sime 12 Apr 2023
Yo, Bitcoin Fax is my baby.
Pass me the number on that email address or on nostr and I will take a look.
The price page is a base price per page, though some numbers are special.
Some fax numbers allow you to charge a premium so people are discouraged to send faxes. Kind of like reverse charges.
Unfortunately it's not an exact science.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @timechain 12 Apr 2023
Hey there, I relayed this message to him, thanks, will let you know if he gets back to me.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @timechain 12 Apr 2023
He replied:
"You can pass along the number. It's a cellular phone number. It might be the reason is expensive ?"
(Guess we know the reason why it was more expensive than expected.)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sime 12 Apr 2023
Thanks for the follow-up though, I'm trying to clear the uncertainty on nostr too. https://iris.to/note1le24ze4gd6zzlqj5q8gy8gd0q7c35stpsmrd3snqn434rnpxqerqzefk30
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sime 12 Apr 2023
Yes exactly. Mobile numbers are more expensive.
reply