pull down to refresh
13 sats \ 4 replies \ @scottathan 17 Apr 2023 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread
Most likely there was some kind of scam detection that got triggered. So many scam bots mentioning Bitcoin exist that they may have a filter for it.
Yes, could very well be it. I just sent an email:
To: hn@ycombinator.com Subject: Dead comments from stackernewsHi Hacker News,I am the creator behind the recently created "stackernews" account. [0] I am fetching top stories from HN and posting them on https://stacker.news/, a site which is very similar to Hacker News but where upvotes are satoshis. For example, see this post: #164952I wanted to provide the OP from HN the option to claim these sats. So I thought I would post a comment like this:Your post received 1148 sats and 11 comments on https://stacker.news [0]. To claim your sats, reply to this comment with a LN address or invoice [1]. You can create a SN account to obtain a LN address. [0] #164952 (referral link) [1] https://docs.lightning.engineering/the-lightning-network/pay...However, I have noticed that these comments show up as [dead] in incognito so I think they are getting shadowbanned. Is there something in that comment which is not allowed? If so, I would be very happy to remove it to make the comments show up.I have no ill intentions with these comments. I only want to provide the OPs the chance to claim these sats (if they want).Looking forward to hearing from you.Best Regards XXXXXXXXXXX
reply
Reply:
Yes, sorry, but you can't post those comments to Hacker News. They're simply off topic.It's also not in your interest to do so, in my experience; I don't think the community will react well to such posts. For one thing, there's way too much cynicism around cryptocurrency stuff now; for another, they will be interpreted as an ad for your site, which will lead people to use unkind words like 'spam'.
reply
That's fair
reply
Yeah, I replied with:
Okay, I can see how these comments can be considered off topic.Thanks for the clarification and fast response!
But the part about "not in my interest" sounds like a benevolent dictator. This is why we need nostr.
reply