142 sats \ 4 replies \ @JulienPH 29 Apr 2023 \ on: DarthCoin position regarding AI/chatGPT bitcoin
I agree on two points:
  • ChatGPT is not something we can trust because it is not open source and already censors a lot.
  • The idea of creating a summary of a link is not particularly useful, and I am skeptical in its ability to make a really good summary.
But I don't understand your position AI = COMMUNISM
"You still do not want to see but this AI introduced slowly into your life is the PURE COMMUNISM that is coming."
If we are able to train our AI transparently, and find useful use cases, why not adopt them? I have the impression that you are hostile on this subject of AI, not just text generation.
My argument is more abstract and philosophical than concrete on this issue of link summary. In the future, we and the next generation will use much more AI than we can potentially imagine, whether we like it or not. We might as well make sure that today we give AI a good "environment" to develop and find its place, and this if possible thanks to the Bitcoin community that I think is sincerely intelligent and well-intentioned.
write
preview
16 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin OP 29 Apr 2023
But I don't understand your position AI = COMMUNISM
You do not understand because you never lived in real communism and you were trained to embrace it for decades.. Watch and think again.
If we are able to train our AI transparently
Training AI means you are training your enemy, you are digging your own grave, no matter how "open source" or not.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @JulienPH 29 Apr 2023
I will go watch this video thanks. And FYI I'm a French expatriate who works in Luxembourg, the socialist-communist toxic hive mind is strong in France, I know what it is 😅
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @nullama 30 Apr 2023
ChatGPT is not something we can trust because it is not open source and already censors a lot.
There are a few open source alternatives that are getting better, so this is just a matter of time.
The idea of creating a summary of a link is not particularly useful, and I am skeptical in its ability to make a really good summary.
I do believe it's useful because attention is very scarce. If you get a summary of a long text you may decide to read it completely based on the summary. Otherwise you would just see it as a block of text, and you would have no idea if it's worth the effort.
You simply don't have enough attention to read everything in the original format.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @JulienPH 1 May 2023
I am not against the idea of the summary in itself, yes it is a good idea, even if it's a bit gimmicky. I just doubt ChatGPT is able at doing it well enough
reply