pull down to refresh

Yahoo News Biden proposes 30% climate change tax on cryptocurrency mining Ben Adler Ben Adler
The Biden administration is pushing for a tax on crypto mining. (Photo illustration: Kelli R. Grant/Yahoo News; photos: Leah Millis/Reuters, Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg via Getty Images, Getty Images) The Biden administration is pushing for a tax on crypto mining. (Photo illustration: Kelli R. Grant/Yahoo News; photos: Leah Millis/Reuters, Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg via Getty Images, Getty Images) The White House is trying to persuade Congress to pass a 30% tax on the electricity used in cryptocurrency mining in the next federal budget in order to minimize the nascent industry’s impact on climate change.
“Cryptominers’ high-energy consumption has negative spillovers on the environment, quality of life, and electricity grids where these firms locate across the country,” the president’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) argues in a blog post that will appear on the White House website on Tuesday, to which Yahoo News gained advance access. The post will lay out the case for the Digital Asset Mining Energy (DAME) excise tax, which the CEA writes is an “example of the Administration’s efforts to fight climate change and reduce energy prices.”
"Currently, cryptomining firms do not have to pay for the full cost they impose on others, in the form of local environmental pollution, higher energy prices, and the impacts of increased greenhouse gas emissions on the climate,” the CEA writes in its post. “The DAME tax encourages firms to start taking better account of the harms they impose on society.”
Burning fossil fuels to create electricity accounts for 25% of annual U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and releases harmful air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and particulate matter.
Critics of the proposed tax say the crypto mining industry is being unfairly targeted. “This puts a clear line in the sand that they do not like the industry. They are looking for ways to hamstring it,” Tom Mapes, director of energy policy at the Chamber of Digital Commerce, told Yahoo News. “This is just a way to go after the industry which they do not support.”
In “proof-of-work” cryptocurrency mining — the most energy-intensive approach to mining, and the one used by bitcoin, by far the largest cryptocurrency — massive supercomputers compete to be the first to solve a mathematical puzzle. This process requires massive amounts of electricity. According to a White House report from last September, cryptocurrency mining consumes more power than the entire country of Australia. In the U.S., which is home to roughly one-third of crypto mining operations, it accounts for an estimated 0.9% to 1.7% of all the country’s electricity use.
That energy use is growing rapidly as the crypto industry expands. In the United States, the world’s leader in cryptocurrency mining, 34 large-scale bitcoin mines collectively use as much electricity as nearly 3 million U.S. households, the New York Times reported. Ten of those mines are connected to the energy grid in Texas, and those mines’ demand for electricity has led the state grid operators to charge higher prices for all customers to make sure supply and demand are in balance and to avoid blackouts.
In New York, where one crypto mining company bought and reactivated a decommissioned natural-gas-fired power plant to power its operation, Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, signed a bill late last year that would put a moratorium on licensing for any more fossil-fuel-powered crypto mining facilities.
State or local regulation might just lead the industry to move elsewhere, the White House says, so it believes that the federal government needs to step in and provide some national regulation that reflects the social cost of crypto mining. The tax would be phased in over three years, starting at 10% next year, then rising to 20% and finally 30%.
“Where we see the strains emerging are in these places that are drawing off the grid, where this starts getting noticed at the level that communities are pushing back and are experiencing consequences of it,” an economist on the CEA who spoke on the condition of anonymity told Yahoo News. “Localities are dealing with it, and they’re struggling to come up with solutions on their own.”
Story continues... [But I've not got js enabled]
“Cryptominers’ high-energy consumption has negative spillovers on the environment, quality of life, and electricity grids"
wait so does that mean the tax goes directly to the people? or just to more war? yeah, probably more war, the greenest industry of all.
reply
I know he's senile, but there has to be someone around him who realizes how dumb this is. Mining will be driven out of the country, and I can't believe this administration is so shortsighted that they think this is a good thing for the US.
reply
This isn't dumb, the concerted efforts (by the NY times and co) to smear mining, and now this, is a concerted effort to stop bitcoin adoption in the us. This isn't a move from a senile man, this is a move likely backed and funded by banking and other interests
reply
I agree with the motivation you suggest. The reason it's dumb is that it will fail. See this post by Odell
reply
There are. Many are just going with the narrative. Others will chime in… but this has to be amplified thru public outcry. Then the smart people around him will have a better voice in the room of naysayers. Satoshi action fund for one! Go Dennis Porter!
reply
Indeed. Miners can move relatively easy. They will always have to go where it is profitable to mine, not only in terms of energy but taxes too. This tax proposition is just another way of saying, "get out of here we don't want you here".
reply
deleted by author
reply
This sounds illegal. The government cannot pick and choose who pays a high or low tax. For fairness and justice they should put 30% tax on all electricity consumption or not do it at all.
reply
Oh its legal. The government can and does pick and choose what industry or salary rate individuals or organizations pay at about the skin thin line of not directly naming individual persons
reply
It’s illegal because Texas has it’s own grid, no interstate commerce
reply
lolololol. The state doing something that is illegal? That war was lost a few years into the founding of the USA.
reply
deleted by author
reply
I guess he wants more mining in countries with low environmental standards. So much for caring about the climate.
reply
Net positive for the network if mining moves out of the US (more decentralisation)!
reply
this would be good, US KYC mining pools are getting too big
reply
Name one good thing US federal government has done since 2001
reply
I read somewhere that most miners use excess or recycled energy to minimize cost.
China was originally a hub for mining because of so many underutilized power plants
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fm 22 Jan
just wait until they tax all of us for farting like cows
reply
Time to change Biden.
reply
Good. Let’s distribute the hash ✌️
reply
Good thing all those miners are on wheels.
reply
“This is just a way to go after the industry which they do not support.”
Bingo, Yahoo.
It's just a way to stop folk from being successful with the better systems they have developed. I mean let's face it, most working for government still need to pretend they are worth something when they use taxes to score blow for a one night stand.
Climate change lol. Tell that to every other industry and nation that's stepped up there use of coal and 'fossil fuels' over the last twenty years.
reply
bruh, I can't. Just do a flat carbon tax if your crazy about this
reply
Old man doesn't even know what he's talking about ... I don't have hottakes on chemistry, why is making hottakes on this?
reply
only for holders of American passports)))) please!) even 2000%%
reply