pull down to refresh
related posts
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @felixduhaut 10 May 2023
Switched to phoenix wallet and I've never looked back. Its great
reply
2 sats \ 1 reply \ @phygit 9 May 2023
Have to admit that I'm quite disappointed in Muun right now. I was among those defending it so far, as it offers a great UX and usually works well to onboard newbies.
But a proper BTC wallet should work whatever the fees are. Right now, and for almost a week, Muun is simply not usable, even for on-chain transactions with well calibrated fees. It's bad.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 May 2023
https://i.postimg.cc/XNHy5FTM/darth-MUUN.jpg
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 May 2023
People called me crazy when I always called Muun a shity wallet...
https://i.postimg.cc/c4tSWC39/Muun-others.jpg
You can ignore my advice, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring my advice.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @gnilma 9 May 2023
They will have to adapt and change, or they will be out-competed and be left in the sand. This is the way the free market works, and it's the most efficient way. This is the way.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ssats 9 May 2023
Yes but more specifically? sadly it will come down to worse UX.
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @gnilma 9 May 2023
More specifically, Muun is an on-chain 2 of 2 multisig wallet with an on-chain to lightning swap service. When on-chain fees are high, the reliance on swaps make the wallet unfeasible / not economical to operate, especially for small amounts; therefore, it directly affects the usability of the wallet. Muun will simply not be able to compete with other true native lightning wallets’ fees and will lose users as a result. That is why I said they need to adapt and change, or risk becoming obsolete.
reply