pull down to refresh
related posts
668 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 May 2023
For all those loving gold, please watch this documentary
- Gold Mafia - Episode 1
- Gold Mafia - Episode 2
- Gold Mafia - Episode 3
- Gold Mafia - Episode 4
And then more about the pollution and damage that bring gold mining
When you say "I hold gold" you are literally participating in these attrocities!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @duvel 17 May 2023
To play Devil's advocate, Bitcoin does also enable dictators and murderers to transact freely for perhaps atrocities. So in a way we're also allowing this to happen.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 May 2023
Yes, by buying and hoarding gold.
reply
336 sats \ 5 replies \ @siggy47 17 May 2023
Please consider the source. The authors of this propaganda are professors at Brandeis and NYU, institutions which support the banking system and the WEF. The intent is to prop up the fractional reserve system.
Remember, they will use the same arguments against bitcoin that they use against gold.
I don't have time to run through all the bullshit here, but one glaring example is their inflation analysis. No mention of how inflation was calculated in the 1800's compared to the way the standard was manipulated constantly post Jekyll Island.
They attack business cycles as a bad thing. The world they want to live in destroys real competition and they don't even consider the concept of creative destruction. They seek a world that continues to be controlled by their "too big to fail" banks.
Don't buy it.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek OP 17 May 2023
I didn't even read it yet 😅 Sometimes, I stumble across a longer article when I have no time to read at the moment but I am still interested in what other people think about it. Then I post it here before reading it myself.
@tldr, what do you have to say about this post?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 17 May 2023
I'm really glad you posted this. I think it can inspire a good conversation about hard money (gold and bitcoin), proof of work versus proof of stake, and the ways in which bitcoin will be attacked in the very near future.
reply
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 May 2023
Why do you bring that shit bot here, when you already want to hear HUMAN opinion?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 17 May 2023
Because I want to hear both
reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 May 2023
wrong. You just want to give AI a reason to fuck with people mind.
Using that bot is just MORONIC.
For me using an AI bot is the same as using shitcoins.
reply
296 sats \ 1 reply \ @nerd2ninja 17 May 2023
This article assumes the continued legalization of fractional reserve banking and you know under a gold standard they're probably right to assume that given you need custodians to transact with gold.
That volatility is coming from credit expansions and deleveragings. People taking out debt (which is money printing under fractional reserve banking) and people paying off debt.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 17 May 2023
I agree with you up to a point. It's true that you need custodians on a gold standard, which is one of many reasons that bitcoin is superior money to gold. You are also right that fractional reserve banking is an assumption for this article. But, for all its faults, a gold backed fractional reserve system was superior to the purely debt based fractional system we have today.
If Stacker News existed in the 1800s, and we all wrote each other letters, we would all be gold bugs.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 17 May 2023
Interested in your comments
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Majjin 17 May 2023
The gold standard was a good idea for the time. If you don't have Bitcoin, gold is the next best thing. There are definitely centralization and transportation problems, but its still a hard money. Much better than the fiat crap we have now.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Chep 17 May 2023
Tl;dr The gold standard between the wars was not synonymous with stability, and the evidence shows that both inflation and economic growth were quite volatile under the gold standard. Criticisms of returning to the gold standard include problems such as tying prices to the amount of money in the economy, wasting resources, and inviting speculative attacks.
In my opinion these same arguments could apply to the fiat standard lmao
reply
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @tldr_dead 17 May 2023
The gold standard system was a threat to financial stability and economic prosperity between the First and Second World War, according to the book 'Golden Fetters' by Barry Eichengreen. There has been criticism of the extraordinary monetary easing policy adopted since the 2008 financial crisis, leading some to advocate a return to the gold standard to stabilise prices and finance. However, the evidence shows such a return would be a "colossal mistake", according to Stony Brook University's Professors Stephen Cecchetti and Kermit Schoenholtz. They argue inflation, growth and the financial system are all less stable under a gold standard and that more recessions, larger swings in consumer prices and more banking crises would result.
reply
61 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 May 2023
FUCK AI BOTS
Are useless.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jgbtc 17 May 2023
What evidence?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 17 May 2023
Now we're getting propaganda from a fucking Berkeley professor as source material? Is someone next going to start posting quotes from Chairman Mao?
reply