I appreciate your persistence in trying to convert me. This is not my first foray into the Sovereign Citizen theory, and had first studied it in depth around 2008 under George Gordon. I had hoped you weren't requiring me to adopt it in order to engage in this discussion, though I could recognize your perspective.

In regard to morality, your perspective is well founded. In a world where the NAP is supreme, such as one founded on Common Law, this framework is completely rational.

In this world, we deal with the slave and the slaveholder and the slave not only defends his master with force but polishes and struts about presenting his chains for adoration.

There is no hope for world peace until the return of the Rightful King, and until then we can only be at peace ourselves and invite others to join us.

This is my point, to provide a means for the guilty pleasure of the slave to secretly undermine his master even while still being subject to him. This is how we win conversions, not by attacking their character for wherefrom they presently hail.