pull down to refresh

At best, it's a correlative stock of a holding company to the underlying Bitcoin, a custodial trusted entity. You can trade and use this like a stock in Retirement and Tax incentivized accounts and it's perhaps better to have exposure to Bitcoin via this method than buying whatever globo-mega mutual fund or Bank ETF your local Bank is pushing.
At worst it's a paper issuance of BTC that you don't control and it might not even be 1-1 held or solvent, so it's 3 or 4 layers deep of custody, sitting as collateral in some exchanges account, hoping that no employee goes renegade and rugs everyone for which underwrites never recover or make good to investors 1-1.
Consider both scenarios. Is there a grey area where having some ETF opposed to XYZ stonk is acceptable in addition to cold storage?
Or is this to be avoided at all costs and is antithesis to Bitcoin it's self?
(FWIW Canada already has covered call Bitcoin ETFs.)
Not really but people always need their boogymen. Blackrock is generally viewed negatively but Larry is very clear about what Blackrock does. The company manages money. None of the trillions they have access to is their money. He repeats it over and over. Blackrock is behaving based on the requests of its clients. But that falls on deaf ears because people would rather rip into Fink for ESG stuff while Blackrock also has oil and gas investments. Instead of reaching for the logical conclusion that maybe with trillions under management Blackrock has sizeable clients from both industries I guess its just easier to say "REEE FINK BAD REEE" and put no energy into thinking about things.
So, ETF's are not bad. In the case of Blackrock this is them attempting to meet the needs and demands of their clients. ETF's can be integrated into retirement plans which means you no longer have to hold Bitcoin to feel its effects. Its effects can be felt by your automatically managed 401k account instead. You don't even have to be aware and most people won't because most just open an account with their employer's provider and let it do its thing. This is how Bitcoin integrates into every day lives.
Custody of Bitcoin really has no need to be the focus of everything involved with Bitcoin. Care less about the custody and more about the utility.
reply
OP here. Good points! I think the issue is risk...
Not holding your own coins can be construed as risk. But great points.
reply
I don't care about ESG. My problem is BlackRock is practically the government right now. Look at this quote from a Business Insider article from last year:
Former BlackRock investment executive Brian Deese leads Biden's National Economic Council, effectively serving as his top advisor on economic matters. Biden also tapped Adewale "Wally" Adeyemo, a former chief of staff to BlackRock chief executive and longtime Democrat Larry Fink, to serve as a top official at the Treasury Department.
Meanwhile Michael Pyle, BlackRock's former global chief investment strategist who had worked in the Obama administration before joining the firm, serves as chief economic advisor to Vice President Kamala Harris.
Do people really believe the U.S. government is going to sit back and watch as bitcoin absorbs the entire bond market, destroys the U.S. dollar, and U.S. hegemony? BlackRock will help contain bitcoin's price and influence just as JP Morgan Chase has been keepng gold under control since 1970. We may all do well wealth wise in the process, but is that all you want from bitcoin?
reply
So my retirement plan is going to force me to sell back into fiat?
What will fiat be worth when I retire? Will people accept fiat? Will I even be able to trade my fiat for Bitcoin then?
reply
Fiat is going to outlast your lifetime and you should plan for that. Your kids may be living in a different world.
reply
Yes, my kids will be living in a different world. I want them to have money that works in that world, not an IOU.
How certain are you that fiat will last X amount of years, and how can you be certain?
reply
I know I'm going to have to start looking over my shoulder after saying this on SN but I guess that's what the 2nd amendment is for (and also Darth is away for a while):
A bitcoin ETF is probably a good thing. As you say, an ETF is just another custodian. There is counter-party risk to be sure but I do think that the SEC is a fairly efficient regulator, and bitcoin by its nature is much easier to audit. Also, if BlackRock or another ETF issuer were to engage in some fractional-reserve fuckery, I'm pretty sure that's a market inefficiency just waiting to be exploited by some hedge fund.
Who knows, maybe some people will start with an ETF and then move on to self-custody as they learn more.
In addition to all of the legitimate use-cases for bitcoin, it happens to be an excellent portfolio diversifier (for now). I have a few percent of my retirement account in a bitcoin futures ETF, specifically because of its volatility. I don't care if it's a fiat game or whatever - I still live in a fiat world and I need to pay fiat for most things.
As for the U.S. government sitting back and watching bitcoin destroy the dollar (@siggy47) - maybe they understand it's inevitable and are trying to navigate it in the best way possible. At the very least, an ETF ensures they make some money from capital gains tax. And who knows, maybe Satoshi Nakamoto was a CIA team that realized that the best way to propel America forward was to gradually switch to a harder currency while re-paying our debts to our geopolitical competitors in rapidly-depreciating fiat.
reply
ETFs are a fiat game, while Bitcoin is creating a new game entirely.
They want to keep you in the fiat game while they play the new one. So yes, ETFs are that bad, as with every other fiat-denominated "asset" out there
Do you want to win the fiat game, or the Bitcoin game?
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
reply
let's be honest, it IS a great thing we are about to have an ETF, it symbolises how far BTC has succeeded in terms of institutional recognition and provides a green light for the next wave of adoption
the big questions now are not whether it will be adopted, but how..
the banking oligopoly still has tight control over financial markets (and the organisations that regulate them)
and the biggest bitcoin businesses will very soon be that exact same banking cartel
reply
Yeah, another great point. What happens if the banking industry takes over and integrates into many aspects of Bitcoin. It's a real concern.
Thank God Saylor is a whale.
reply
It's really bad that they try to package something that only exists for the sake of decentralization and self-custody etc and package it in something that explicitly is centralized and fiduciary
It's "not bad" in a sense that you don't have to own it and can choose to ignore its exsistence
reply
Yes. It's all that bad.
reply