pull down to refresh

Just ran into this today. Was going to do a Phoenix to Phoenix invoice which was typically less than 5 sats. With the new version it would have cost 4000 sats. Crazy.
Back to using Mutiny, Zeus, Breez
You sure that was the tx fee and not the fee to open a channel (includes mining fee)?
reply
sending "big" amounts like >50$ will cost you more on phoenix than on-chain (with the current on-chain fees).
But if you are sending 100$ or more constantly, onchain is cheaper even with high fees.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 3 Oct 2023
Ah, I see:
vs
Yeah, with 1-2 sat/vB onchain LN is only useful for micropayments.
reply
Also , when you receive a payment bigger than the inbound capacity you have you will be paying the onchain fee too.
reply
I have plenty of channels open with outbound liquidity higher than $100 and pay much less than what on-chain fees would cost. If I was doing thousands of dollars, then it would be different
reply
Yeah, definitely not opening channel fee. Onchain fees were really cheap at the time. I ended up sending the transaction on Zeus for a much cheaper fee. Zeus has some cool new LSP features where you can run an embedded node on your own phone.
reply