53 sats \ 9 replies \ @siggy47 21 Oct 2023 \ parent \ on: Hal Finney Was Not Satoshi Nakamoto bitcoin
Sure it's just a matter of curiosity. I take your point about the dangers of his returning. His opinion would hold a tremendous amount of weight. I'm not worried, though. If he is alive and decided to stay out of the blocksize wars, I think it's safe to say he won't be tossing his weight around in the future.
I wonder if knowledge about Satoshi's true identity is therefore an information hazard
reply
Yes. I have heard this argument about plans for 3d printing weapons. I'm always suspicious of these arguments as really being an attack on free speech. In the U.S. we hear about dangerous misinformation that later is accepted as fact.
reply
Interesting, haven't though of this in the context of free speech before.
I just thought about this as a way to evaluate information. Is this information valuable? What can I do with this information? What could this information do if it gets into the hands of "wrong people"?
So more from a privacy perspective. But now I see the context of free speech clearly, lol
reply
I'm ambivalent myself. Do I want easy to follow plans to build a nuclear warhead readily available?
reply
Like if satoshi were the NSA?
reply
This is total bullshit
reply
Could be
Could also be the reason no one knows who satoshi is
reply
and is better that we just consider that he's dead.
end of story.
reply
No. His opinion doesn't matter anymore.
Bitcoin is not anymore what was in the years of SN.
All these speculations are just useless.
Guys please stop all this crap.
Anything you hear as "news" about SN are exactly to manipulate your perception.
SN is dead. Live with that. Forever.
reply