Antpool just earned $130 by mining full-rbf
1007 sats \ 9 comments \ @petertodd 4 Nov 2023 bitcoin
txid: 660eb59df70dbcc19b5e3fc4f5532a9160d891de4af9225db332238a1518e984
My understanding is this is some kind of ordinals-related transaction. Not sure why they pay such high fees. But transactions like this are pretty common to see.
Anyway, if your pool isn't mining full-rbf, they're leaving (some) money on the table. Which might explain why roughly 40% of hashpower is mining full-rbf these days... incentives work!
write
preview
related posts
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @nemo 4 Nov 2023
deleted by author
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Nov 2023
deleted by author
reply
376 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 4 Nov 2023
376k sats, for those who don’t open the screenshot
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @gunson 4 Nov 2023
Why would a pool not mine full RBF? 🤔
reply
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @petertodd OP 4 Nov 2023
Pools have told me that having to deal with big-blocker trolls is one reason. The extra fee revenue isn't necessarily worth the hassle of your employees getting harassed. Hopefully as more pools adopt it that problem goes away.
Also, if you run a node, you should enable it!
https://petertodd.org/2023/why-you-should-run-mempoolfullrbf
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Nov 2023
Interesting case.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @rustaceanrob 4 Nov 2023
This is the new version of paying 10k Bitcoin for a pizza
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 4 Nov 2023
How would one know if their pool mines full-rbf?
Edit: also, mempool.space says this TX does not support RBF? I am thoroughly confused
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Abystrader 4 Nov 2023 freebie
Is this normal ? I don't think so.