No. He wanted to know our "secret" about coinjoin over SN. And that information was passed over the SN DM feature that some users (that paid attention) are using it.

Actually, I was mostly commenting on something unrelated that I was discussing with k00b.

The specifics of the actual privacy of Lightning are far from simple. I was pointing out that it is fairly immoral to create a platform where con-artists (let's let them remain unnamed) with great incentive to lie about their own competence, do just that, when a new user with stars in their eyes wants to speculate away their money on cryptocurrency.

The privacy of lightning is far from solved. It is also difficult to find unbiased sources about it, especially on this website: The person here who could explain the details of how much is handwaved away by DarthCoin with the phrase "No it's private if you know how to use it", is probably @TonyGiorgio. But though his expertise isn't in doubt, he also has incentive to "be bullish" about the state of things.

Here are a few links for @0xbitcoiner about privacy and lightning to show what I mean.

An article that doesn't try to sell it to you: https://voltage.cloud/blog/lightning-network-faq/lightning-network-privacy-explainer/

A better source, the actual git repo where they propose how to solve privacy concerns (note, still in proposal phase): https://github.com/lightning/bolts/blob/master/proposals/route-blinding.md

Or the meeting the lightning devs had a few days ago, which also partly concerned privacy. https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1116

So yes, handwaving OPs question away is not great. But Darth/Nat can do what they want, I don't specifically care about them but more about stacker.news as a whole.

and PS. I don't care about coinjoin over SN at all, whatever that is, I don't use crypto other than in my job and I have no reason to be "pseudonymous". I would like to know how to DM people on stacker though...