346 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 11 Nov 2023 \ on: Swan Bitcoin to Stop Serving Customers Interacting with Privacy Services bitcoin
I have a question regarding this. If Swan is supposed to be only a DCA (buy only BTC) and not selling, how is supposed to know that a new withdraw BTC address (users must always use a new address to withdraw from Swan) is part of a mixing/coinjoin whatever? I can even create a new set of seeds/xpubs everytime I withdraw and nobody could say that my new address is part of a coinjoin.
I find this Swan move quite stupid and over reacted. Or am I missing something?
write
preview
31 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Nov 2023
I used to buy with Swan. I did not want to reuse my withdraw address, so I manually created a new "wallet" each time I withdrew to have a new address. If you want automated withdrawals you have to reuse an address, if I'm not mistaken.
reply
312 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 12 Nov 2023
Not mistaken
reply
285 sats \ 1 reply \ @nemo 12 Nov 2023
deleted by author
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Nov 2023
Very possible, but that's not what I did. I never moved it automatically.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @bzzzt 12 Nov 2023
Yes i was wondering something similar. Is it that they will close your account if an address you sent btc from swan is eventually tied to a coinjoin ?
reply