by wonderful @roy🔥🔥
pull down to refresh
73 sats \ 1 reply \ @roy 27 Nov 2023
Thank you 🙏
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 27 Nov 2023
good work as usual.
reply
12 sats \ 1 reply \ @nicosey 27 Nov 2023
FOSS is about trust. Article is spot on.
How about times do we hear, don't trust verify? Closed sourced bitcoin companies are not bitcoin companies...
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @jamierobinson 27 Nov 2023
The article is addressing FOSS vs verifiable/visible code that just can’t be commercially copied. This lets everyone verify 100%, while affording copyrights to dev’s years investment into developing it.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @rafael_xmr 28 Nov 2023
Very based, "source available/verifiable" software is proprietary and NOT free software.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitByBit21 27 Nov 2023
I wonder what @nvk thinks about it...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TwoLargePizzas 28 Nov 2023
While I agree 100% with FOSS principles I don't think you're going to get rid of closed source companies building on top of Bitcoin just because you don't like it.
The best we can hope for is FOSS alternatives. And by that logic, our efforts should be put towards building those FOSS alternatives. It's one thing to declare the problem, it's another thing to implement the solution.
Satoshi declared the problem in his whitepaper. Then the proceeded to implement the solution. That's the winning formula.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lederhosen 27 Nov 2023
Good read
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 27 Nov 2023
Cool article
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 27 Nov 2023
@roy maybe you answer the comments in case haha
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Zepasta 27 Nov 2023
Good article
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @03cfa08a86 27 Nov 2023
Interesting
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @jamierobinson 27 Nov 2023 freebie
Expecting everyone to work for free is not reasonable. There must be a mix. Direct profit drives invention. Article ignores the time cost of removing incentives.