31 sats \ 5 replies \ @elvismercury 5 Dec 2023
Ha, there was a user I didn't know, so I wanted to see what they'd done. 1.5m sats from one single SN post! Legend.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Cowboy 5 Dec 2023
Probably someone clicked ZAP by mistake
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @elvismercury 5 Dec 2023
Hell of a mistake!
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Cowboy 5 Dec 2023
This guy posted only a single post on SN @02838203b0
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 12 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Dec 2023
Insane! I hadn't noticed. It looks like coinjoin mix :)
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @utxoclub 7 Dec 2023
where do i collect my trophy
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 7 Dec 2023
https://image.nostr.build/6592f51d045f229d9c1f92f25522a41d0198b5802337c3ebd5895361ad3c5812.gif
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 5 Dec 2023
You should add the next 2 columns: number of comments and number of posts in total.
Then will be a much better overview.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Dec 2023
https://m.stacker.news/6842
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 5 Dec 2023
goooood, now you can see who did a "proof of work" for those sats 😂😂
150 sats per comment/post on average
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Dec 2023
https://m.stacker.news/6843
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 5 Dec 2023
I could say that my activity posting on SN is correlated with BTC hashrate 😂😂😂😂
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Dec 2023
https://imgprxy.stacker.news/e9RrbfpT-siZDbJHt9G0JJxK3FV1g0oLEJWzAonm_Lo/rs:fit:1280:720/aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWRpYS1tYW5hZ2VyLm5vdGljaWFzYW9taW51dG8uY29tLzk2MC9uYW9tXzYwNDEzMWRjY2M3Y2IuanBn
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Cowboy 5 Dec 2023
We can check this too!
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Dec 2023
over time ?
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cowboy 5 Dec 2023
https://m.stacker.news/6808
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cowboy 5 Dec 2023
Yes
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Dec 2023
This is a snapshot! But I think I understand what you're saying, you're using the "for custom" filter?
reply